Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305626›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2023

A narrative review of peripheral blood parameters for urothelial carcinoma treated with systemic antitumor drugs.

Takashi Nagai, Taku Naiki, Yosuke Sugiyama, Toshiki Etani, Maria Aoki, Masakazu Gonda, Toshiharu Morikawa, Keitaro Iida, Nami Tomiyama, Ryosuke Ando and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Comparison of preoperative nutritional scoring systems for predicting survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi NagaiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Taku NaikiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yosuke SugiyamaDepartment of Pharmacy, Nagoya City University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiki EtaniDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Maria AokiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Masakazu GondaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiharu MorikawaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Keitaro IidaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Nami TomiyamaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryosuke AndoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Noriyasu KawaiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPNagoya City University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: The prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) is poor. To date, the gold standard of treatment for patients with aUC has been cisplatin-based chemotherapy. More recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been widely used for such patients, which has led to an improvement in their prognosis. In clinical practice, predicting the effectiveness of antitumor drugs or the prognosis of patients is important for making decisions on treatment strategies. Various parameters obtained from blood tests in the pre-ICI era have been adopted for patients in the ICI era. In this review, we summarize the parameters reflecting the status of aUC patients treated with ICIs based on current evidence. Methods: We conducted a literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar. The publications chosen were all peer-reviewed journals published over an unlimited time period. Key Content and Findings: Numerous inflammatory or nutritional parameters can be obtained from routine blood tests. These reflect malnutrition or systemic inflammation in patients with cancer. As in the pre-ICI era, these parameters are useful for predicting the effectiveness of ICIs and the prognosis of patients treated with ICIs. Conclusions: Various parameters are related to systemic inflammation and malnutrition, and are easily obtained from a routine blood test. Using these parameters from various studies as reference points is useful in making decisions on treatment for aUC.

Indexed as

Advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC)inflammationnutritional assessment

Identifiers

PMID37305626
PMCPMC10251088
OpenAlexW4367332342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.