Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305615›Full record

ArticleInformatics in medicine unlocked2023

Building the observational medical outcomes partnership's T-MSIS Analytic File common data model.

Nick Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Informatics in medicine unlocked, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nick WilliamsNational Library of Medicine, Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, Bethesda, MD United States of America.

Funding

Applied Clinical InformaticsZIHLM010016 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LYNCH, PAUL · 2021 to 2025
$36.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 LM999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This effort used Databricks to create an Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) for Transformed MSIS Analytic File (TAF) Medicaid records. Materials and methods: Our process included data volume and content assessment of TAF, translation mapping of TAF concepts to OMOP concepts and the creation of Extract Transform and Load (ETL) code. Results: The final CDM contained 119,048,562 individuals and 24,806,828,121 clinical observations from 2014 through 2018. Discussion: The transformation of TAF into OMOP can support the generation of evidence with special attention to low-income patients on public insurance. Such patients are perhaps underrepresented in academic medical center patient populations. Conclusion: Our effort successfully used Databricks to transform TAF records into OMOP CDM. Our CDM can be used to generate evidence for OMOP network studies.

Indexed as

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesCommon Data ModelMedicaidObservational Health Data Sciences and InformaticsObservational Medical Outcomes Partnership

Identifiers

PMID37305615
PMCPMC10249773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.