Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Preoperative prediction of VETC in hepatocellular carcinoma using non-Gaussian diffusion-weighted imaging at high b values: a pilot study.

Chenhui Li, Yan Wen, Jinhuan Xie, Qianjuan Chen, Yiwu Dang, Huiting Zhang, Hu Guo, Liling Long

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chenhui LiDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yan WenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jinhuan XieDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qianjuan ChenDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yiwu DangDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Huiting ZhangMR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hu GuoMR Application, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Changsha, Hunan, China.
Liling LongDepartment of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Guangxi Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University · CNSiemens (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) have been considered an important cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) metastasis. Purpose: To compare the potential of various diffusion parameters derived from the monoexponential model and four non-Gaussian models (DKI, SEM, FROC, and CTRW) in preoperatively predicting the VETC of HCC. Methods: 86 HCC patients (40 VETC-positive and 46 VETC-negative) were prospectively enrolled. Diffusion-weighted images were acquired using six b-values (range from 0 to 3000 s/mm2). Various diffusion parameters derived from diffusion kurtosis (DK), stretched-exponential (SE), fractional-order calculus (FROC), and continuous-time random walk (CTRW) models, together with the conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) derived from the monoexponential model were calculated. All parameters were compared between VETC-positive and VETC-negative groups using an independent sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and then the parameters with significant differences between the two groups were combined to establish a predictive model by binary logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to assess diagnostic performance. Results: Among all studied diffusion parameters, only DKI_K and CTRW_α significantly differed between groups (P=0.002 and 0.004, respectively). For predicting the presence of VETC in HCC patients, the combination of DKI_K and CTRW_α had the larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) than the two parameters individually (AUC=0.747 vs. 0.678 and 0.672, respectively). Conclusion: DKI_K and CTRW_α outperformed traditional ADC for predicting the VETC of HCC.

Indexed as

diffusion-weighted imageshepatocellular carcinomamagnetic resonance imagingnon-Gaussian modelspredictionvessels encapsulating tumor clusters

Identifiers

PMID37305565
PMCPMC10248416
OpenAlexW4378232313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.