ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Densely Convolutional Spatial Attention Network for nuclei segmentation of histological images for computational pathology.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Image-based analysis of lymphoma cell heterogeneity: Comparative study of CRYO and FFPE techniques.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- MS-GATOR: multi-scale graph attention with topological reasoning for segmentation and classification of prostate cancer based on Gleason scores using histopathology images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated tumor stroma ratio assessment in colorectal cancer using hybrid deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automatic Fracture Detection Convolutional Neural Network with Multiple Attention Blocks Using Multi-Region X-Ray Data.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative Study of Cell Nuclei Segmentation Based on Computational and Handcrafted Features Using Machine Learning Algorithms.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Analysis of breast region segmentation in thermal images using U-Net deep neural network variants.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Automatic nuclear segmentation in digital microscopic tissue images can aid pathologists to extract high-quality features for nuclear morphometrics and other analyses. However, image segmentation is a challenging task in medical image processing and analysis. This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based method for nuclei segmentation of histological images for computational pathology. Methods: The original U-Net model sometime has a caveat in exploring significant features. Herein, we present the Densely Convolutional Spatial Attention Network (DCSA-Net) model based on U-Net to perform the segmentation task. Furthermore, the developed model was tested on external multi-tissue dataset - MoNuSeg. To develop deep learning algorithms for well-segmenting nuclei, a large quantity of data are mandatory, which is expensive and less feasible. We collected hematoxylin and eosin-stained image data sets from two hospitals to train the model with a variety of nuclear appearances. Because of the limited number of annotated pathology images, we introduced a small publicly accessible data set of prostate cancer (PCa) with more than 16,000 labeled nuclei. Nevertheless, to construct our proposed model, we developed the DCSA module, an attention mechanism for capturing useful information from raw images. We also used several other artificial intelligence-based segmentation methods and tools to compare their results to our proposed technique. Results: To prioritize the performance of nuclei segmentation, we evaluated the model's outputs based on the Accuracy, Dice coefficient (DC), and Jaccard coefficient (JC) scores. The proposed technique outperformed the other methods and achieved superior nuclei segmentation with accuracy, DC, and JC of 96.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 96.2 - 96.6), 81.8 (95% CI: 80.8 - 83.0), and 69.3 (95% CI: 68.2 - 70.0), respectively, on the internal test data set. Conclusion: Our proposed method demonstrates superior performance in segmenting cell nuclei of histological images from internal and external datasets, and outperforms many standard segmentation algorithms used for comparative analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.