Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305407›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2023

The role of microbiota in the pathophysiology of uterine fibroids - a systematic review.

Lidia Korczynska, Natalia Zeber-Lubecka, Magdalena Zgliczynska, Elzbieta Zarychta, Kornelia Zareba, Cezary Wojtyla, Michalina Dabrowska, Michal Ciebiera

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Endometrial Microbiome and Reproductive Receptivity: Diverse Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lidia KorczynskaSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia Zeber-LubeckaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Magdalena ZgliczynskaDepartment of Obstetrics, Perinatology and Neonatology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Elzbieta ZarychtaSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Kornelia ZarebaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Cezary WojtylaInternational Prevention Research Institute - Collaborating Centre, Calisia University, Kalisz, Poland.
Michalina DabrowskaDepartment of Genetics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Michal CiebieraSecond Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLInternational Prevention Research Institute · FRThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a long time, the uterus had been considered a sterile organ, meaning that under physiological conditions the uterus would not be colonized by bacteria. Based on available data, it may be concluded that the gut and uterine microbiome are related, and that the role of this microbiome is greater than expected. Despite being the most common pelvic neoplasms in women of reproductive age, uterine fibroids (UFs) are still poorly understood tumors whose etiology has not been fully determined. This systematic review presents the relationship between intestinal and uterine dysbiosis and uterine fibroids. A systematic review of three medical databases was carried out: the MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane. In this study, 195 titles and abstracts were reviewed, including only original articles and clinical trials of uterine microbiome criteria. Finally, 16 studies were included to the analysis. In recent years, researchers dealing with reproduction in a broad sense have focused on the microbiome in various locations to study its role in the pathogenesis and, consequently, the prevention and treatment of diseases of the genital organ. Conventional microbial detection methods are not suitable for identifying bacteria, which are difficult to culture. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) provides an easier and faster and more informative analysis of bacterial populations. It seems that gut microbiota dysbiosis has the potential to be a risk factor for uterine fibroids or affect the disease process. Some changes were shown in many types of bacteria, such as

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaGastrointestinal MicrobiomeLeiomyomaMicrobiotaAnimalsDysbiosisFemaleHumans16S rRNAbacterialeiomyomamicrobiomemicrobiotaNGSpathophysiologyuterine fibroid

Identifiers

PMID37305407
PMCPMC10250666
OpenAlexW4378386666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.