Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305377›Full record

ArticleKidney medicine2023

Dialysis Patient Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Survey Study.

Elyssa M Noce, Laura Brereton, Mary Zorzanello, Abinet Aklilu, Elizabeth Anders, Melia Bernal, Anusha Sundararajan, Neera K Dahl, Ravi Kodali, Dipal M Patel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elyssa M NoceDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut.
Laura BreretonInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mary ZorzanelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Abinet AkliluDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Elizabeth AndersSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Melia BernalSchool of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Anusha SundararajanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Neera K DahlDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Ravi KodaliDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Dipal M PatelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ACUTE AND CHRONIC RENAL DISEASET32DK007276 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ARONSON, PETER S., CANTLEY, LLOYD G · 1986 to 2022
$9.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale & Objective: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic imposed several changes in the care of patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis. We explored patient care experiences during the pandemic. Study Design: The study team verbally administered surveys including Likert scale multiple-choice questions and open-ended questions and recorded responses. Setting & Participants: Surveys were administered to adults receiving dialysis through an academic nephrology practice after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Exposure: Outpatient dialysis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcomes: Perceptions of care and changes in health. Analytical Approach: Multiple-choice responses were quantified using descriptive statistics. Thematic analysis was used to code open-ended responses and derive themes surrounding patient experiences. Results: A total of 172 patients receiving dialysis were surveyed. Most patients reported feeling "very connected" to the care teams. Seventeen percent of participants reported transportation issues, 6% reported difficulty obtaining medications, and 9% reported difficulty getting groceries. Four themes emerged as influencing patient experiences during the pandemic: 1) the COVID-19 pandemic did not significantly affect participants' experience of dialysis care; 2) the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted other aspects of participants' lives, which in turn were felt to affect mental and physical health; 3) regarding dialysis care experience more generally, participants valued consistency, dependability, and personal connection to staff; and 4) the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the importance of external social support. Limitations: Surveys were administered early in the COVID-19 pandemic, and patient perspectives have not been reassessed. Further qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews was not performed. Survey distribution in additional practice settings, using validated questionnaires, would increase generalizability of the study. The study was not powered for statistical analysis. Conclusions: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, perceptions of dialysis care were unchanged for most patients. Other aspects of participants' lives were impacted, which affected their health. Subpopulations of patients receiving dialysis may be more vulnerable during the pandemic: those with histories of mental health conditions, non-White patients, and patients treated by in-center hemodialysis. Plain-language summary: Patients with kidney failure continue to receive life-sustaining dialysis treatments during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We sought to understand perceived changes in care and mental health during this challenging time. We administered surveys to patients receiving dialysis after the initial wave of COVID-19, asking questions on topics including access to care, ability to reach care teams, and depression. Most participants did not feel that their dialysis care experiences had changed, but some reported difficulties in other aspects of living such as nutrition and social interactions. Participants highlighted the importance of consistent dialysis care teams and the availability of external support. We found that patients who are treated with in-center hemodialysis, are non-White, or have mental health conditions may have been more vulnerable during the pandemic.

Indexed as

access to careCOVID-19 pandemicdialysisend stage kidney diseaseKidney failurekidney replacement therapymental healthpatient experienceperceptions of care

Identifiers

PMID37305377
PMCPMC10186967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.