Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305168›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2023

Cooperativity boosts affinity and specificity of proteins with multiple RNA-binding domains.

Simon H Stitzinger, Salma Sohrabi-Jahromi, Johannes Söding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Roquin exhibits opposing effects on RNA stem-loop stability through its two ROQ domain binding sites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution.

Simon H StitzingerQuantitative and Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Salma Sohrabi-JahromiQuantitative and Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Johannes SödingQuantitative and Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, Am Fassberg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9642-8244
Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous cellular processes rely on the binding of proteins with high affinity to specific sets of RNAs. Yet most RNA-binding domains display low specificity and affinity in comparison to DNA-binding domains. The best binding motif is typically only enriched by less than a factor 10 in high-throughput RNA SELEX or RNA bind-n-seq measurements. Here, we provide insight into how cooperative binding of multiple domains in RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) can boost their effective affinity and specificity orders of magnitude higher than their individual domains. We present a thermodynamic model to calculate the effective binding affinity (avidity) for idealized, sequence-specific RBPs with any number of RBDs given the affinities of their isolated domains. For seven proteins in which affinities for individual domains have been measured, the model predictions are in good agreement with measurements. The model also explains how a two-fold difference in binding site density on RNA can increase protein occupancy 10-fold. It is therefore rationalized that local clusters of binding motifs are the physiological binding targets of multi-domain RBPs.

Identifiers

PMID37305168
PMCPMC10251633
OpenAlexW4380089158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.