Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305138›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Biochemical-molecular-genetic biomarkers in the tear film, aqueous humor, and blood of primary open-angle glaucoma patients.

Maria D Pinazo-Durán, Vicente Zanón-Moreno, Carolina García-Villanueva, Alessio Martucci, Cristina Peris-Martínez, Jorge Vila-Arteaga, Jose J García-Medina, Irene Andrés-Blasco, Alex Gallego-Martínez, Carlo Nucci and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tear fluid database: a reference website for tear fluid proteomics.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria D Pinazo-Durán *Ophthalmic Research Unit "Santiago Grisolia", Foundation for Research in Health and Biomedicine (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Vicente Zanón-Moreno *Spanish Network of Inflammatory Diseases: REI-RICORS (RD21/0002/0032) of the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Government, Madrid, Spain.
Carolina García-VillanuevaDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University General Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Alessio MartucciOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Cristina Peris-MartínezSpanish Network of Inflammatory Diseases: REI-RICORS (RD21/0002/0032) of the Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Spanish Government, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Vila-ArteagaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University and Polytechnic Hospital "La Fe", Valencia, Spain.
Jose J García-MedinaOphthalmic Research Unit "Santiago Grisolia", Foundation for Research in Health and Biomedicine (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Irene Andrés-BlascoOphthalmic Research Unit "Santiago Grisolia", Foundation for Research in Health and Biomedicine (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Alex Gallego-MartínezOphthalmic Research Unit "Santiago Grisolia", Foundation for Research in Health and Biomedicine (FISABIO), Valencia, Spain.
Carlo NucciOphthalmology Unit, Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Julian García-FeijooDepartment of Ophthalmology, The University Clinic Hospital "San Carlos", Madrid, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · ITHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Glaucoma is a chronic neurodegenerative disease, which is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. As a response to high intraocular pressure, the clinical and molecular glaucoma biomarkers indicate the biological state of the visual system. Classical and uncovering novel biomarkers of glaucoma development and progression, follow-up, and monitoring the response to treatment are key objectives to improve vision outcomes. While the glaucoma imaging field has successfully validated biomarkers of disease progression, there is still a considerable need for developing new biomarkers of early glaucoma, that is, at the preclinical and initial glaucoma stages. Outstanding clinical trials and animal-model study designs, innovative technology, and analytical approaches in bioinformatics are essential tools to successfully uncover novel glaucoma biomarkers with a high potential for translation into clinical practice. Methods: To better understand the clinical and biochemical-molecular-genetic glaucoma pathogenesis, we conducted an analytical, observational, and case-comparative/control study in 358 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients and 226 comparative-control individuals (CG) to collect tears, aqueous humor, and blood samples to be processed for identifying POAG biomarkers by exploring several biological pathways, such as inflammation, neurotransmitter/neurotrophin alteration, oxidative stress, gene expression, miRNAs fingerprint and its biological targets, and vascular endothelial dysfunction, Statistics were done by using the IBM SPSS 25.0 program. Differences were considered statistically significant when Results: Mean age of the POAG patients was 70.03 ± 9.23 years, and 70.62 ± 7.89 years in the CG. Malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), interleuquin (IL)-6, endothelin-1 (ET-1), and 5 hydroxyindolacetic acid (5-HIAA), displayed significantly higher levels in the POAG patients vs. the CG ( Discussion: We are incredibly enthusiastic gathering as much information as possible on POAG biomarkers to learn how the above information can be used to better steer the diagnosis and therapy of glaucoma to prevent blindness in the predictable future. In fact, we may suggest that the design and development of blended biomarkers is a more appropriate solution in ophthalmological practice for early diagnosis and to predict therapeutic response in the POAG patients.

Indexed as

biomarkersgenesglaucoma neurodegenerationmiRNAsmoleculesprimary open-angle glaucoma

Identifiers

PMID37305138
PMCPMC10251746
OpenAlexW4378471976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.