Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305134›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

Effect of protective lung ventilation on pulmonary complications after laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Menglin Sun, Ruolin Jia, Lijuan Wang, Daqi Sun, Mingqian Wei, Tao Wang, Lihua Jiang, Yuxia Wang, Bo Yang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Menglin SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ruolin JiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lijuan WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Daqi SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Mingqian WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Lihua JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yuxia WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Compared with traditional open surgery, laparoscopic surgery is widely used in surgery, with the advantages of being minimally invasive, having good cosmetic effects, and having short hospital stays, but in laparoscopic surgery, pneumoperitoneum and the Trendelenburg position can cause complications, such as atelectasis. Recently, several studies have shown that protective lung ventilation strategies are protective for abdominal surgery, reducing the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). Ventilator-associated lung injury can be reduced by protective lung ventilation, which includes microtidal volume (4-8 mL/kg) ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). Therefore, we used randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the results on this topic, and RCTs were used for meta-analysis to further evaluate the effect of protective lung ventilation on pulmonary complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods: In this meta-analysis, we searched the relevant literature contained in six major databases-CNKI, CBM, Wanfang Medical, Cochrane, PubMed, and Web of Science-from their inception to October 15, 2022. After screening the eligible literature, a randomized, controlled method was used to compare the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications when a protective lung ventilation strategy and conventional lung ventilation strategy were applied to laparoscopic surgery. After statistical analysis, the results were verified to be statistically significant. Results: Twenty-three trials were included. Patients receiving protective lung ventilation were 1.17 times less likely to develop pulmonary complications after surgery than those receiving conventional lung ventilation (hazard ratio [RR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.22; Conclusion: Compared with conventional mechanical ventilation, protective lung ventilation reduces the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. For patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, we suggest the use of protective lung ventilation, which is effective in reducing the incidence of lung injury and pulmonary infection. Implementation of a low tidal volume plus moderate positive end-expiratory pressure strategy reduces the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgerymeta-analysismoderate PEEPprotective lung ventilationpulmonary complicationssmall tidal volume

Identifiers

PMID37305134
PMCPMC10248173
OpenAlexW4378232259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.