ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023
High-accuracy detection of supraspinatus fatty infiltration in shoulder MRI using convolutional neural network algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence revolution in shoulder magnetic resonance imaging: current evidence and future directions for rotator cuff diagnosis.Clinics in shoulder and elbow · 2026Article
- Patient-Level Classification of Rotator Cuff Tears on Shoulder MRI Using an Explainable Vision Transformer Framework.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in Shoulder Pain Imaging: A Narrative Review of Current Practice and Emerging Trends.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Rotator Cuff Tear Detection: A Systematic Review of MRI-Based Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in diagnosing upper limb musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Automated segmentation and classification of supraspinatus fatty infiltration in shoulder magnetic resonance image using a convolutional neural network.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The supraspinatus muscle fatty infiltration (SMFI) is a crucial MRI shoulder finding to determine the patient's prognosis. Clinicians have used the Goutallier classification to diagnose it. Deep learning algorithms have been demonstrated to have higher accuracy than traditional methods. Aim: To train convolutional neural network models to categorize the SMFI as a binary diagnosis based on Goutallier's classification using shoulder MRIs. Methods: A retrospective study was performed. MRI and medical records from patients with SMFI diagnosis from January 1st, 2019, to September 20th, 2020, were selected. 900 T2-weighted, Y-view shoulder MRIs were evaluated. The supraspinatus fossa was automatically cropped using segmentation masks. A balancing technique was implemented. Five binary classification classes were developed into two as follows, A: 0, 1 v/s 3, 4; B: 0, 1 v/s 2, 3, 4; C: 0, 1 v/s 2; D: 0, 1, 2, v/s 3, 4; E: 2 v/s 3, 4. The VGG-19, ResNet-50, and Inception-v3 architectures were trained as backbone classifiers. An average of three 10-fold cross-validation processes were developed to evaluate model performance. AU-ROC, sensitivity, and specificity with 95% confidence intervals were used. Results: Overall, 606 shoulders MRIs were analyzed. The Goutallier distribution was presented as follows: 0 = 403; 1 = 114; 2 = 51; 3 = 24; 4 = 14. Case A, VGG-19 model demonstrated an AU-ROC of 0.991 ± 0.003 (accuracy, 0.973 ± 0.006; sensitivity, 0.947 ± 0.039; specificity, 0.975 ± 0.006). B, VGG-19, 0.961 ± 0.013 (0.925 ± 0.010; 0.847 ± 0.041; 0.939 ± 0.011). C, VGG-19, 0.935 ± 0.022 (0.900 ± 0.015; 0.750 ± 0.078; 0.914 ± 0.014). D, VGG-19, 0.977 ± 0.007 (0.942 ± 0.012; 0.925 ± 0.056; 0.942 ± 0.013). E, VGG-19, 0.861 ± 0.050 (0.779 ± 0.054; 0.706 ± 0.088; 0.831 ± 0.061). Conclusion: Convolutional neural network models demonstrated high accuracy in MRIs SMFI diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.