Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305114›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2023

Comparison of oral sodium phosphate tablets and polyethylene glycol lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Li Yao-Dong, Wang Yi-Ping, Mai Gang, Han Yang-Yun, Zhu Ling-Ling, Deng Hong, Deng Jia-Zheng, Xiang Rong-Chao, Li You-Wei, Zhao Ming and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Li Yao-DongGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Wang Yi-PingWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Mai GangSurgical Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Han Yang-YunSurgical Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Zhu Ling-LingWest China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Deng HongGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Deng Jia-ZhengGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Xiang Rong-ChaoSurgical Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Li You-WeiSurgical Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Zhao MingGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Ding Shun-BinGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Ling JingGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Shen YangGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Dong Jia-QiGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Deng LeiGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Song Xiong-FengGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Zhang You-JianGastroenterology Department of Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, China.
Zhou Zuo-QiongSchool of Medical and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Deyang Stomatological Hospital · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically compare the bowel cleaning ability, patient tolerance and safety of oral sodium phosphate tablets (NaPTab) and oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution (PEGL) to inform clinical decision making. Methods: PubMed, Embase, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for studies that used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the roles of NaPTab and PEGL in bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included papers. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 13 RCTs were eligible for inclusion, including 2,773 patients (1,378 and 1,395 cases in the NaPTab and PEGL groups, respectively). Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in the cleansing quality of the NaPTab and PEGL groups [RR 1.02, 95% CI (0.96-1.08), Conclusions: While NaP tablets and PEGL were shown to have a similar cleaning effect before colonoscopy, NaP tablets had improved patient tolerance. However, NaP tablets had a strong effect on serum potassium, calcium, and phosphorus levels. For patients with low potassium, low calcium, and renal insufficiency, NaP tablets should be prescribed with caution. For those at high-risk for acute phosphate nephropathy, NaP tablets should be avoided. Given the low number and quality of included studies, these conclusions will require additional verification by large high-quality studies. Systematic review registration: 10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0013, identifier: NPLASY202350013.

Indexed as

bowel preparationcolonoscopymeta-analysispolyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solutionsodium phosphatesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37305114
PMCPMC10250678
OpenAlexW4378387337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.