Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37305036›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Precision radiotherapy using MR-linac for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in MEN1 patients (PRIME): a protocol for a phase I-II trial, and systematic review on available evidence for radiotherapy of pNETs.

Eline N M van Vliembergen, Hidde Eijkelenkamp, Gerlof D Valk, Menno R Vriens, Gert J Meijer, Martijn P W Intven, Joanne M de Laat

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial ProtocolSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Approach to the Patient: Insulinoma.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eline N M van VliembergenDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Hidde EijkelenkampDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gerlof D ValkDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Menno R VriensDepartment of Endocrine Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Gert J MeijerDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Martijn P W IntvenDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Joanne M de LaatDepartment of Endocrine Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection is the standard of care for the treatment of pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors (pNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1). However, surgery can cause significant short- and long-term morbidity. Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is a potential effective treatment with little side effects. With traditional radiotherapy techniques, irradiation of pancreatic tumors to high dose levels was hampered by poor visibility of the tumor during treatment. MRgRT uses onboard MRI to guide the treatment, thereby enabling delivery of ablative irradiation doses to the tumor, while sparing surrounding tissues. In this study, we describe results from a systematic review assessing efficacy of radiotherapy in pNET and present the protocol of the PRIME study. Methods: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for articles assessing efficacy and side effects of radiotherapy for the treatment of pNETs. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I Risk of Bias Tool for observational studies. Descriptive statistics were used to describe results of included trials. Results: Four studies comprising of 33 patients treated by conventional radiotherapy were included. Despite the heterogeneity of studies, radiotherapy appeared to be effective for the treatment of pNETs with most patients responding (45.5%) or stabilizing (42.4%) in tumor size. Conclusion and trial design: Due to the limited literature available and concerns about damage to surrounding tissue, conventional radiotherapy is currently little used for pNETs. The PRIME study is a phase I-II trial with a single arm prospective cohort study design, investigating the efficacy of MRgRT in MEN1 patients with pNET. MEN1 patients with growing pNETs with a size between 1.0 and 3.0 cm without malignant features are eligible for inclusion. Patients are treated with 40 Gy in 5 fractions on the pNET, using online adaptive MRgRT on a 1.5T MR-linac. The primary endpoint is the change in tumor size at MRI 12 months follow-up. Secondary endpoints include radiotoxicity, quality of life, endocrine and exocrine pancreas function, resection rate, metastatic free and overall survival. When MRgRT is found effective with low radiotoxicity, it could reduce the need for surgery for pNET and preserve quality of life. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO https://clinicaltrials.gov/, (CRD42022325542).

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroendocrine TumorsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesQuality of LifeMR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT)MR-linacmultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET)radiosensitivityradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37305036
PMCPMC10250693
OpenAlexW4378469469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.