Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304993›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Overall survival of prostate cancer from Sangrur and Mansa cancer registries of Punjab state, India.

Atul Madhukar Budukh, Jarnail S Thakur, Tapas Kumar Dora, Prithviraj R Kadam, Sonali S Bagal, Kamalesh Kumar Patel, Alok K Goel, Sankalp M Sancheti, Ashish R Gulia, Pankaj P Chaturvedi and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. What's Inside?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Atul Madhukar BudukhCentre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Jarnail S ThakurDepartment of Community Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Tapas Kumar DoraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
Prithviraj R KadamCentre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sonali S BagalCentre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Kamalesh Kumar PatelCentre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Alok K GoelDepartment of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
Sankalp M SanchetiDepartment of Pathology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
Ashish R GuliaHomi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Sangrur, Punjab, India.
Pankaj P ChaturvediDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rajesh P DikshitCentre for Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Rajendra A BadweDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Training School Complex, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Tata Memorial Hospital · INHomi Bhabha National Institute · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is a scarcity of population-based prostate cancer survival data in India. We assessed the population-based, overall survival of patients with prostate cancer from the Sangrur and Mansa cancer registries of the Punjab state, India. Methods: In the year 2013-2016, a total of 171 prostate cancer cases were registered in these two registries. Based on these registries, survival analysis was performed using the date of diagnosis as the starting date and the last follow-up date being December 31, 2021 or the date of death. Survival was calculated using STATA software. Relative survival was calculated using the Pohar Perme method. Results: Follow up was available for all the registered cases. Of the 171 cases, 41 (24%) were alive and 130 (76.0%) were dead. Of the prescribed treatments, 106 (62.7%) cases completed the treatment and 63 (37.3%) cases did not complete the treatment. Overall, 5-year age-standardized prostate cancer relative survival was 30.3%. Patients who completed the treatment had a 7.8 times higher 5-year relative survival (45.5%) compared to those who did not (5.8%). The difference between the two groups is statistically significant (hazard ratio 0.16, 95% confidence interval [0.10-0.27]). Conclusion: To improve survival, we need to raise awareness in the community and among primary physicians so that prostate cancer cases can reach the hospital early and should be treated effectively. The cancer center should develop the systems in their hospital so that there will be no hurdles to the patients in treatment completion. We found a low overall relative survival among patients of prostate cancer in these two registries. Patients who received treatment had a significantly higher survival.

Identifiers

PMID37304993
PMCPMC10249534
OpenAlexW4380291782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.