ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
Urodynamics in the evaluation of lower urinary tract symptoms in young adult men: A systematic review.
Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Urodynamic Parameters on Treatment Decision-Making in Men Under 50 With Treatment-Resistant Chronic Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Article
- Comparison of Free Uroflowmetry and Pressure-Flow Study Parameters: A Retrospective Analysis in Non-Neurogenic Male Patients.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Observational
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Treatment Failure in Neurourology: From Automated Urodynamics to Precision Management.International neurourology journal · 2025Article
- Transvaginal Repair of Supratrigonal, Juxtacervical, Vault, and Apical Vesicovaginal Fistulae: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Functional MRI Analysis of Brain Activity in Rats With Diabetic Bladder Dysfunction.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
- The underappreciated underactive bladder.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Review
- Videourodynamics - role, benefits and optimal practice.Nature reviews. Urology · 2025Review
- Underactive Bladder and Detrusor Underactivity: New Advances and Prospectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- What's Inside?Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of IndiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This review aims to systematically evaluate the available evidence on the different urodynamic diagnoses of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in young adult men aged 18-50 years and to summarize the various urodynamic parameters based on these diagnoses. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement and the search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library from inception till September 2021. A total of 295 records were identified using a combination of keywords such as LUTS, urodynamics (UDS), and young males. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021214045). Results: All the ten studies, which were included in this analysis, categorised the patients into either of the four primary diagnoses after the UDS - primary bladder neck obstruction (PBNO), dysfunctional voiding, detrusor underactivity (DU), or detrusor overactivity. Five of these studies used the conventional UDS, and in the other five a video UDS was performed. The most common abnormality on the conventional UDS was DU with a pooled estimate of 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.104-0.463, Conclusion: A urodynamic diagnosis was possible in 79% and 98% of the young men who underwent a conventional UDS or a video UDS, respectively. However, the men subjected to the conventional UDS and the video UDS had significant differences in their primary urodynamic diagnostic label. These results will help to plan future trials for the evaluation and management of LUTS in young men.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.