Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304857›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2023

Comparison of performance data between emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 program formats.

Michael S Beeson, Melissa A Barton, Earl J Reisdorff, Wallace A Carter, Marianne Gausche-Hill, Diane L Gorgas, Kevin B Joldersma, Sally A Santen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Emergency Medicine Milestones Final Ratings Are Often Subpar.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Comparison of performance data between emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 program formats.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael S BeesonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Summa Health Akron Ohio USA.
Melissa A BartonAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Earl J ReisdorffAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3553-446X
Wallace A CarterDepartment of Emergency Medicine Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York USA.
Marianne Gausche-HillDepartment of Emergency Medicine Harbor-University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency Los Angeles California USA.
Diane L GorgasDepartment of Emergency Medicine The Ohio State Wexner Medical Center Columbus Ohio USA.
Kevin B JoldersmaAmerican Board of Emergency Medicine East Lansing Michigan USA.
Sally A SantenDepartment of Emergency Medicine University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio and Department of Emergency Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study compares performance data from physicians completing 3-year versus 4-year emergency medicine residency training programs. Currently, there are 2 training formats and little is known about objective performance differences. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of emergency residents and physicians. Multiple analyses were conducted comparing physicians' performances, including Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education Milestones and American Board of Emergency Medicine In-training Examination (ITE), Qualifying Examination (QE), Oral Certification Examination (OCE), and program extensions from 3-year and 4-year residency programs. Some confounding variables were not or could not be considered, such as rationale for medical students to choose one format over another, as well as application and final match rates. Results: Milestone scores are higher for emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-3 programs (3.51) versus emergency medicine 3 residents in 1-4 programs (3.07; Conclusions: These results suggest that although performance measures demonstrate small differences between physicians from emergency medicine 1-3 and 1-4 programs, these differences are limited in their ability to make causal claims about performance on the basis of program format alone.

Indexed as

durationemergency medicineformatresidencytraining

Identifiers

PMID37304857
PMCPMC10257037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.