Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304759›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2023

Predatory behavior under monocular and binocular conditions in the semiterrestrial crab

Thomas Harper, Sergio Iván Nemirovsky, Daniel Tomsic, Julieta Sztarker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Thomas HarperInstituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sergio Iván NemirovskyInstituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniel TomsicInstituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Julieta SztarkerInstituto de Fisiología, Biología Molecular y Neurociencias (IFIBYNE), Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: We tested how predatory responses towards the dummy changed when animals' vision was monocular (one eye occluded by opaque black paint) compared to binocular. Results: Even though monocular crabs could still perform predatory behaviors, we found a steep reduction in the number of attacks. Predatory performance defined by the probability of completing the attacks and the success rate (the probability of making contact with the dummy once the attack was initiated) was impaired too. Monocular crabs tended to use frontal, ballistic jumps (lunge behavior) less, and the accuracy of those attacks was reduced. Monocular crabs used prey interception (moving toward the dummy while it approached the crab) more frequently, favoring attacks when the dummy was ipsilateral to the viewing eye. Instead, binocular crabs' responses were balanced in the right and left hemifields. Both groups mainly approached the dummy using the lateral field of view, securing speed of response. Conclusion: Although two eyes are not strictly necessary for eliciting predatory responses, binocularity is associated with more frequent and precise attacks.

Indexed as

binocular integrationcrustaceaneye occlusionpredatory strategystereopsis

Identifiers

PMID37304759
PMCPMC10248132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.