Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304755›Full record

ArticleIEEE signal processing magazine2023

Physics-Driven Deep Learning for Computational Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Combining physics and machine learning for improved medical imaging.

Kerstin Hammernik, Thomas Küstner, Burhaneddin Yaman, Zhengnan Huang, Daniel Rueckert, Florian Knoll, Mehmet Akçakaya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE signal processing magazine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. CONSISTENCY MODELS FOR FAST MRI USING REGULARIZATION BY DENOISING.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Foundation Models Meet Medical Image Interpretation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kerstin HammernikInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich and the Department of Computing, Imperial College London.
Thomas KüstnerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen.
Burhaneddin YamanDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, USA.
Zhengnan HuangCenter for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University.
Daniel RueckertInstitute of AI and Informatics in Medicine, Technical University of Munich and the Department of Computing, Imperial College London.
Florian KnollDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen.
Mehmet AkçakayaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, USA.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Minnesota · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKing's College London · GBNew York University · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
TRD4 - Ultrahigh Field Engineering and SafetyP41EB027061 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Gregory John Metzger, KAMIL UGURBIL · 2019 to 2026
$11.7M
Rapid Comprehensive Cardiac MRI Exam for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery DiseaseR01HL153146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI AKCAKAYA, MEHMET · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Learning an Optimized Variational Network for Medical Image ReconstructionR01EB024532 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI JOHNSON, PATRICIA MARGARET, KNOLL, FLORIAN · 2018 to 2021
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153146NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB027061NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physics-driven deep learning methods have emerged as a powerful tool for computational magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) problems, pushing reconstruction performance to new limits. This article provides an overview of the recent developments in incorporating physics information into learning-based MRI reconstruction. We consider inverse problems with both linear and non-linear forward models for computational MRI, and review the classical approaches for solving these. We then focus on physics-driven deep learning approaches, covering physics-driven loss functions, plug-and-play methods, generative models, and unrolled networks. We highlight domain-specific challenges such as real- and complex-valued building blocks of neural networks, and translational applications in MRI with linear and non-linear forward models. Finally, we discuss common issues and open challenges, and draw connections to the importance of physics-driven learning when combined with other downstream tasks in the medical imaging pipeline.

Indexed as

Accelerated MRIdeep learningiterative image reconstructionmachine learningnumerical optimizationparallel imagingphysics-driven learning

Identifiers

PMID37304755
PMCPMC10249732
OpenAlexW4313524971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.