ArticleAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2023
Remodeling of the aortic root-a 28-year journey.
Article in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aortic valve repair in 2026 - state of the art: what every cardiologist should know.Cardiology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Root remodeling is one form of valve-preserving root replacement for aortic regurgitation and root aneurysm. The objective of this review was to summarize our experience with root remodeling encompassing 28 years. Methods: We performed root remodeling in 1,189 patients (76% male, mean age 53±14 years) between October 1995 and September 2022. The original valve morphology was unicuspid in 33 (2%), bicuspid in 472 (40%) and tricuspid in 684 (58%) patients. Fifty-four patients (5%) had Marfan's syndrome. Objective measurement of valve configuration was performed in 804 (77%) and an external suture annuloplasty was added in 524 patients (44%). Cusp repair was performed in 1,047 (88%) patients, most commonly for prolapse (n=972; 82%). Mean follow-up was 6.7±5.5 years [1 month to 28 years]. Follow-up was 95% complete (7,700 patient-years). Results: Survival was 71% at 20 years; freedom from cardiac death was 80%. Freedom from aortic regurgitation ≥2 was 77% at 15 years. Freedom from reoperation was 89% and was higher in tricuspid aortic valves (94%) compared to bicuspid (84%) and unicuspid valves (P<0.001). Since the introduction of effective height measurement, freedom from reoperation has remained stable at 15 years (91%). With the addition of a suture annuloplasty, freedom from reoperation was 94% at 12 years. The difference with or without annuloplasty (91%) was not significant (P=0.949). Conclusions: Root remodeling is a viable option in valve-preserving root replacement. Concomitant cusp prolapse is frequent and can be corrected reproducibly by intraoperative measurement of effective height. The long-term benefit of an annuloplasty still needs to be defined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.