ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2023
Blood Donation Screening of Transfusion-Transmissible Viral Infection Using Two Different Nucleic Acid Testing (NAT) Platforms: A Single Tertiary Care Oncology Centre Experience.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Added Value of Nucleic Acid Testing in Blood Banks: A 15-Year Retrospective Study from India.Cureus · 2025Article
- Molecular advances in transfusion medicine: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of NAT reactivity and CLIA in detecting transfusion transmitted Infection among blood donors.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Analysis of HIV infection among voluntary blood donors based on HIV ELISA and nucleic acid detection.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is used to screen transfusiontransmittable infections (TTIs) in donated blood samples and provide an additional layer of blood safety. In this study, we describe our experience in screening viral TTIs using two formats of NAT: cobas® MPX2 polymerase chain reaction- based minipool NAT (PCR MP-NAT) and Procleix Utrio Plus transcription-mediated amplificationbased individual donor-NAT (TMA ID-NAT). Data routinely collected as a part of blood bank operations were retrospectively analysed over a period of 70 months for TTIs. Blood samples were initially screened for HIV, HBV, HCV, syphillis by chemiluminescence and malaria by Rapid card test. In addition to serological testing, all samples were further screened by TMA-based ID-NAT (ProcleixUltrio Plus Assay) during Jan 2015-Dec 2016, and by PCR-based MP-NAT (Cobas® TaqScreen MPX2) during Jan 2017-Oct 2020.
resultsA total of 48,151 donations were processed over 70 months, of which 16,212 donations were screened by ProcleixUtrio Plus TMA ID-NAT and 31,939 donations by cobas® MPX2 PCR MP-NAT. Replacement donors and male donors outnumbered voluntary donors and female donors respectively. The overall NAT yield rate of MP-NAT was 1:2281 compared to 1:3242 with ID-NAT, during the respective time period. ID-NAT detected 5 HBV infections missed by serology, whereas MP-NAT detected 13 HBV infections and 1 HCV infection missed by serology. The proportion of donations that were both seroreactive and NAT reactive was higher with MP-NAT (59.8%) compared to ID-NAT (34.6%). Cobas® MPX2MP-NAT had higher overall NAT yield rate compared to ProcleixUtrio Plus ID-NAT and confirmed a higher proportion of seroreactive donations. Due to the ease of operation, simple algorithm, cobas® MPX2 PCR based MP-NAT can be an effective solution for blood screening in India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.