ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2023
Does the Inclusion of CD34+ B-cell Progenitors (Hematogones) in Stem Cell Enumeration of Apheresis Product Using ISHAGE Protocol Affect the Final Harvest dose Adequacy and the Outcome of Transplantation? A Single Institution Experience from Southern India.
Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Hematogones have similar antigenic and light scatter properties when compared to CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) but they form a separate cluster with dimmer CD45 expression. These should be excluded while enumerating HSC, as their inclusion can overestimate and hence affect the final dose of HSC. However, their exact impact on the outcome of HSC transplant (HSCT) is not entirely known and hence this study was undertaken to address these issues, if any. Methods: This was a retrospective study in which patients undergoing HSCT were included, and flow cytometric enumeration was done on the apheresis product using single platform ISHAGE protocol. The gating of all plots was reviewed and carefully studied for hematogone population which would have otherwise been included in the original gating. Results: Totally 78 patients underwent HSCT during the study period. On re-analysis, it was found that 10/78 (12.8%) cases had a separate hematogone population which was included in the HSC in the original analysis. Out of these 10 cases, 7/51 and 3/27 were in autologous and allogenic subgroup respectively. However, all the ten cases ultimately had adequate final stem cell dose and had successful engraftment. Conclusion: The inclusion of hematogones in CD34+ HSC enumeration of apheresis products did not yield any impact on neither the final dose nor the outcome of transplant in this study. However, it is recommended to exclude them from the final count when they are > 10% of the final HSC lest it overestimate the final harvest dose and outcome of HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.