Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2023

Helix encoder: a compound-protein interaction prediction model specifically designed for class A GPCRs.

Haruki Yamane, Takashi Ishida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Haruki YamaneDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi IshidaDepartment of Computer Science, School of Computing, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Institute of Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest class of GPCRs. They are essential targets of drug discovery and thus various computational approaches have been applied to predict their ligands. However, there are a large number of orphan receptors in class A GPCRs and it is difficult to use a general protein-specific supervised prediction scheme. Therefore, the compound-protein interaction (CPI) prediction approach has been considered one of the most suitable for class A GPCRs. However, the accuracy of CPI prediction is still insufficient. The current CPI prediction model generally employs the whole protein sequence as the input because it is difficult to identify the important regions in general proteins. In contrast, it is well-known that only a few transmembrane helices of class A GPCRs play a critical role in ligand binding. Therefore, using such domain knowledge, the CPI prediction performance could be improved by developing an encoding method that is specifically designed for this family. In this study, we developed a protein sequence encoder called the Helix encoder, which takes only a protein sequence of transmembrane regions of class A GPCRs as input. The performance evaluation showed that the proposed model achieved a higher prediction accuracy compared to a prediction model using the entire protein sequence. Additionally, our analysis indicated that several extracellular loops are also important for the prediction as mentioned in several biological researches.

Indexed as

class A GPCRcompound-protein interactiondeep learningextracellular loopligand binding sitetransmembrane region

Identifiers

PMID37304403
PMCPMC10250622
OpenAlexW4378386549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.