ArticleEcology and evolution2023
Extra-pair paternity, breeding density, and synchrony in natural cavities versus nestboxes in two passerine birds.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extra-pair paternity, breeding density, and synchrony in natural cavities versus nestboxes in two passerine birds.Ecology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most of what is known about extra-pair paternity in hole-nesting birds derives from studies using artificial nesting sites, such as nestboxes. However, it has rarely been investigated whether inference drawn from breeding events taking place in nestboxes matches what would be observed under natural conditions, that is, in natural cavities. We here report on a variation in promiscuity in blue tits and great tits nesting in natural cavities and nestboxes in an urban forest in Warsaw, Poland. Specifically, we tested whether local breeding density, local breeding synchrony, and extra-pair paternity (inferred from SNP data generated with a high-throughput genotyping by sequencing method) differed between birds nesting in natural cavities and nestboxes. In both blue tits and great tits, the frequency of extra-pair paternity was similar between the two cavity types. In blue tits, we observed shorter nearest neighbor distance, higher neighbor density, and higher synchronous neighbor density (i.e., density of fertile females) in nestboxes relative to natural cavities. No such pattern was found in great tits. Moreover, we detected a positive relationship between the proportion of extra-pair offspring in the nest and neighbor density around the nest in blue tits. Our results revealed that the provisioning of nestboxes did not change rates of extra-pair paternity, suggesting that conclusions drawn from nestbox studies might adequately represent the natural variation in extra-pair matings in some species or sites. However, the observed differences in spatiotemporal components of breeding dynamics highlight the fact that these parameters should be carefully considered when comparing mating behavior across studies and/or sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.