ArticleDEN open2024
Utility of a partially covered metal stent for salvage sealing therapy for bleeding caused by duodenal invasion of pancreatobiliary cancers: Case series.
Article in DEN open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatobiliary cancer-related gastrointestinal bleeding caused by duodenal invasion can be a life-threatening condition that is hard to control. It is unclear whether a covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) is useful for hemostasis of bleeding related to advanced pancreatobiliary cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a CSEMS for hemostasis of bleeding caused by duodenal invasion of pancreatobiliary cancer. Between January 2020 and January 2022, seven patients in whom a duodenal CSEMS was inserted to control pancreatobiliary cancer-related bleeding were enrolled. The technical and clinical success rates with respect to hemostasis, procedure time, and adverse events were assessed. All patients were inoperable cases (six with pancreatic cancer [five, stage IV; one, stage III]; and one with gallbladder cancer [stage IV]) in whom CSEMs were inserted to treat refractory bleeding caused by cancer invasion. Hemostasis was achieved in all cases (100% [7/7]). The mean procedure time was 17 ± 7.9 min. There were no adverse events, including migration and rebleeding. No rebleeding occurred up until the time of death in any of the cases (mean follow-up period, 73 ± 27 days). Deployment of duodenal CSEMS is a useful salvage therapy for bleeding caused by advanced pancreatobiliary cancer invasion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.