Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304188›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2023

Comparison of complete multi-level vs. iliac-only revascularization for concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease.

Hong Cheng Ren, Tian Run Li, Jin Man Zhuang, Xuan Li, Jing Yuan Luan, Chang Ming Wang, Ming Chao Ding

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hong Cheng RenDepartment of Intervention Vascular, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tian Run LiDepartment of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jin Man ZhuangDepartment of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuan LiDepartment of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing Yuan LuanDepartment of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chang Ming WangDepartment of Intervention Vascular Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming Chao DingDepartment of Intervention Vascular, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNAerospace Center Hospital · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of complete multi-level vs. iliac-only revascularization for the treatment of concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease. Methods: A total of 139 consecutive adult patients with severe stenosis and occlusive iliac and SFA disease with Rutherford categories 2-5 underwent multi-level ( Results: At 48 months, improvement in the Rutherford category was observed in the two groups with no significant difference ( Conclusion: For concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease, iliac-only revascularization has favorable efficacy and safety outcomes compared with complete multi-level revascularization in selected patients with patent profunda femoris artery and at least one healthy outflow tract of the infrapopliteal artery.

Indexed as

deep femoral arteryhome-based walking exercisemulti-level peripheral artery diseaseperipheral arterial diseasesuperficial femoral artery

Identifiers

PMID37304188
PMCPMC10249780
OpenAlexW4378232271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.