Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304121›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Association between metabolically healthy obesity and kidney stones: results from the 2011-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Weinan Chen, Sailimai Man, Yang Hong, Gaohaer Kadeerhan, Liang Chen, Qingquan Xu, Liulin Xiong, Tao Xu, Bo Wang, Xiaobo Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weinan ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sailimai ManDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Yang HongDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gaohaer KadeerhanNational Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.
Liang ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingquan XuDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liulin XiongDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tao XuDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bo WangMeinian Institute of Health, Beijing, China.
Xiaobo HuangDepartment of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The risk of kidney stones in metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) individuals is largely unexplored. This study using percent body fat (%BF) to categorize obesity, to investigate the association between MHO as well as other metabolic syndrome-obesity combined phenotypes and kidney stones in a national representative population. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study included 4,287 participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2011 to 2018. Metabolically healthy status was defined as not having any component of metabolic syndrome or insulin resistance. Obesity was identified by %BF, which was measured and assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. Participants were cross-classified by metabolic health and obesity status. The outcome was self-report kidney stones. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the association between MHO and kidney stones. Results: A total of 358 participants had kidney stones [weighted prevalence (SE): 8.61% (0.56%)]. The weighted prevalence (SE) of kidney stones in MHN, MHOW, and MHO groups was 3.13% (1.10%), 4.97% (1.36%), and 8.55% (2.09%), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, race and ethnicity, education level, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, daily water intake, CKD stage 3-5, and hyperuricemia, MHO individuals (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.18, 7.0) had a significantly higher risk of kidney stones than those with metabolically healthy normal weight. In metabolically healthy participants, a 5% increment in %BF was associated with a significantly higher risk of kidney stones (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.20, 2.14). Furthermore, a nonlinear dose-response relationship between %BF and the kidney stones was observed in metabolically healthy participants ( Conclusion: Using %BF to define obesity, MHO phenotype was significantly associated with higher risks of kidney stones, suggesting that obesity can independently contribute to kidney stones in the absence of metabolic abnormalities and insulin resistance. Regarding kidney stones prevention, MHO individuals might still benefit from lifestyle interventions aimed at healthy body composition maintenance.

Indexed as

Insulin ResistanceKidney CalculiKidney Failure, ChronicMetabolic SyndromeObesity, Metabolically BenignCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNutrition SurveysObesityinsulin resistancekidney stonesmetabolically healthy obesityprecent body faturolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID37304121
PMCPMC10249726
OpenAlexW4378232802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.