Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37304022›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Characterization of the effects of outliers on ComBat harmonization for removing inter-site data heterogeneity in multisite neuroimaging studies.

Qichao Han, Xiaoxiao Xiao, Sijia Wang, Wen Qin, Chunshui Yu, Meng Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qichao HanSchool of Medical Technology, School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxiao XiaoSchool of Medical Technology, School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Sijia WangSchool of Medical Technology, School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Wen QinDepartment of Radiology and Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chunshui YuSchool of Medical Technology, School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Meng LiangSchool of Medical Technology, School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Functional Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data harmonization is a key step widely used in multisite neuroimaging studies to remove inter-site heterogeneity of data distribution. However, data harmonization may even introduce additional inter-site differences in neuroimaging data if outliers are present in the data of one or more sites. It remains unclear how the presence of outliers could affect the effectiveness of data harmonization and consequently the results of analyses using harmonized data. To address this question, we generated a normal simulation dataset without outliers and a series of simulation datasets with outliers of varying properties (e.g., outlier location, outlier quantity, and outlier score) based on a real large-sample neuroimaging dataset. We first verified the effectiveness of the most commonly used ComBat harmonization method in the removal of inter-site heterogeneity using the normal simulation data, and then characterized the effects of outliers on the effectiveness of ComBat harmonization and on the results of association analyses between brain imaging-derived phenotypes and a simulated behavioral variable using the simulation datasets with outliers. We found that, although ComBat harmonization effectively removed the inter-site heterogeneity in multisite data and consequently improved the detection of the true brain-behavior relationships, the presence of outliers could damage severely the effectiveness of ComBat harmonization in the removal of data heterogeneity or even introduce extra heterogeneity in the data. Moreover, we found that the effects of outliers on the improvement of the detection of brain-behavior associations by ComBat harmonization were dependent on how such associations were assessed (i.e., by Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation), and on the outlier location, quantity, and outlier score. These findings help us better understand the influences of outliers on data harmonization and highlight the importance of detecting and removing outliers prior to data harmonization in multisite neuroimaging studies.

Indexed as

ComBat harmonizationimaging derived phenotypesmagnetic resonance imagingmultisiteoutlierssite effect

Identifiers

PMID37304022
PMCPMC10249749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.