ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2023
Characterization of the effects of outliers on ComBat harmonization for removing inter-site data heterogeneity in multisite neuroimaging studies.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Gray Matter Volume Abnormalities in Schizophrenia: Comparisons Between P-Value and Effect Size Inference Frameworks Using Mega- and Meta-Analyses.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Pooled it
- Deciphering the Heterogeneity of Schizophrenia: A Multimodal and Multivariate Neuroimaging Framework for Unveiling Brain-Symptom Relationships and Underlying Subtypes.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2026Article
- Improved Injury Detection Through Harmonizing Multi-Site Neuroimaging Data after Experimental TBI: A Translational Outcomes Project in NeuroTrauma (TOP-NT) Consortium Study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The BAMBOO method for correcting batch effects in high throughput proximity extension assays for proteomic studies.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- An evaluation of image-based and statistical techniques for harmonizing brain volume measurements.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Improved injury detection through harmonizing multi-site neuroimaging data after experimental TBI: a Translational Outcomes Project in Neurotrauma consortium study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Effects of Myofascial Release Techniques on Joint Range of Motion of Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Healthy core: Harmonizing brain MRI for supporting multicenter migraine classification studies.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data harmonization is a key step widely used in multisite neuroimaging studies to remove inter-site heterogeneity of data distribution. However, data harmonization may even introduce additional inter-site differences in neuroimaging data if outliers are present in the data of one or more sites. It remains unclear how the presence of outliers could affect the effectiveness of data harmonization and consequently the results of analyses using harmonized data. To address this question, we generated a normal simulation dataset without outliers and a series of simulation datasets with outliers of varying properties (e.g., outlier location, outlier quantity, and outlier score) based on a real large-sample neuroimaging dataset. We first verified the effectiveness of the most commonly used ComBat harmonization method in the removal of inter-site heterogeneity using the normal simulation data, and then characterized the effects of outliers on the effectiveness of ComBat harmonization and on the results of association analyses between brain imaging-derived phenotypes and a simulated behavioral variable using the simulation datasets with outliers. We found that, although ComBat harmonization effectively removed the inter-site heterogeneity in multisite data and consequently improved the detection of the true brain-behavior relationships, the presence of outliers could damage severely the effectiveness of ComBat harmonization in the removal of data heterogeneity or even introduce extra heterogeneity in the data. Moreover, we found that the effects of outliers on the improvement of the detection of brain-behavior associations by ComBat harmonization were dependent on how such associations were assessed (i.e., by Pearson correlation or Spearman correlation), and on the outlier location, quantity, and outlier score. These findings help us better understand the influences of outliers on data harmonization and highlight the importance of detecting and removing outliers prior to data harmonization in multisite neuroimaging studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.