Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303906›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

The introduction and implementation of open dialogue in a day center in Athens, Greece: experiences and reflections of mental health professionals.

Marina Christina Skourteli, Philia Issari, Lito Dimou, Ariadni O A Antonopoulou, Georgia Bairami, Artemis Stefanidou, V Kouroglou, Stelios Stylianidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marina Christina SkourteliE.P.A.P.S.Y.-Association for Regional Development and Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Philia IssariLaboratory for Qualitative Research in Psychology and Psychosocial Well-being, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Lito DimouE.P.A.P.S.Y.-Association for Regional Development and Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Ariadni O A AntonopoulouLaboratory of Psychopathology, Social Psychiatry and Developmental Psychology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece.
Georgia BairamiLaboratory of Psychopathology, Social Psychiatry and Developmental Psychology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece.
Artemis StefanidouLaboratory of Psychopathology, Social Psychiatry and Developmental Psychology, Panteion University, Athens, Greece.
V KouroglouE.P.A.P.S.Y.-Association for Regional Development and Mental Health, Athens, Greece.
Stelios StylianidisE.P.A.P.S.Y.-Association for Regional Development and Mental Health, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present study is part of a large-scale original action-research project aiming to assess the introduction and implementation of the Open Dialogue approach within the clinical practice of an established multidisciplinary team in a Day Centre in Athens, Greece. More specifically, it aimed to explore the experiences of professionals within the process of implementation both in relation to their clinical practice and their professional identity. Methods: Data collection employed a focus group, which was set up to explore professional reflections of the implementation and research processes since the introduction of the model. Thematic Analysis of transcripts revealed two main themes that correspond to the impact of Open Dialogue on professionals' clinical practice and on team dynamics, respectively. Results: Professionals identify several challenges in implementing OD, such as difficulties in linking theory to practice, containing uncertainty, and addressing cultural barriers to dialogical ways of working. Professionals further reflect on their own internal journey stemming from the implementation of Open Dialogue that has led them to greater openness and growth, personally and as a team. Discussion: The role of mental health professionals is being acknowledged as being at the frontline of any meaningful psychiatric reform through the assimilation and promotion of humanistic paradigms aiming towards a change of culture in psychiatric care across different contexts. Despite variations in implementation across different contexts, the importance of consolidating and embracing Open Dialogue as a philosophical framework underpinning mental health care is being discussed.

Indexed as

action researchimplementationinterpersonal dynamicsmental health multidisciplinary teamopen dialogue

Identifiers

PMID37303906
PMCPMC10249676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.