Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303875›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023

Comparison of continuous erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgaesia in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy: A randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

Lovepriya Sharma, Pradeep Bhatia, Sadik Mohammed, Priyanka Sethi, Swati Chhabra, Mritunjay Kumar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fascial plane blocks: Will they flourish or perish with time?Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lovepriya SharmaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Pradeep BhatiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Sadik MohammedDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Priyanka SethiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Swati ChhabraDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, AIIMS, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Mritunjay KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Raipur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is associated with significant postoperative pain for which many blocks including thoracic paravertebral (TPV) block are being used. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described technique. We planned to compare the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided continuous ESP and TPV blocks for postoperative analgaesia following MRM. Methods: Sixty-six patients belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I and II, aged 25-85 years, undergoing MRM were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. Ipsilateral block was given preoperatively at T3 or T4 level with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine and 50 μg fentanyl. Infusion of 0.5% and 0.2% ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 μg/ml at a rate of 5 ml/hr was continued during intraoperative and postoperative period, respectively. Pain was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) till 24 hours. Block performance time, time to first rescue analgaesia, total amount of rescue analgaesic consumed, the incidence of procedure-related and postoperative complications, failure rate and patient satisfaction score were also recorded. Data collected were analysed using the Chi-square test or Student's Results: Demographics, baseline vitals, VAS scores both at rest and on movement, block performance time, time to first rescue analgaesia, the total amount of rescue analgaesia and patient satisfaction score were comparable in both groups ( Conclusion: In patients undergoing MRM, continuous catheter technique ESP block is as efficacious and safe as TPV block for providing prolonged postoperative analgaesia.

Indexed as

Anaestheticsanalgaesicslocalmastectomymodified radicalnerve blockopioidpainpostoperativevisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID37303875
PMCPMC10248887
OpenAlexW4362711841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.