ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Antimicrobial resistance and machine learning: past, present, and future.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The scholarly footprint of ChatGPT: a bibliometric analysis of the early outbreak phase.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Pooled it
- Global trends in e-cigarette regulatory compliance: A bibliometric analysis of policies and emerging challenges.Medicine · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based early warning model for carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Trends in antimicrobial resistance education research: a bibliometric analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in drug resistance management.3 Biotech · 2025Review
- Fluoroquinolone resistance in ESKAPE pathogens: evolutionary pathways, one health transmission, and clinical surveillance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Comparative genomic and antimicrobial resistance profiles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Tackling the Antimicrobial Resistance "Pandemic" with Machine Learning Tools: A Summary of Available Evidence.Microorganisms · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Machine learning has become ubiquitous across all industries, including the relatively new application of predicting antimicrobial resistance. As the first bibliometric review in this field, we expect it to inspire further research in this area. The review employs standard bibliometric indicators such as article count, citation count, and the Hirsch index (H-index) to evaluate the relevance and impact of the leading countries, organizations, journals, and authors in this field. VOSviewer and Biblioshiny programs are utilized to analyze citation and co-citation networks, collaboration networks, keyword co-occurrence, and trend analysis. The United States has the highest contribution with 254 articles, accounting for over 37.57% of the total corpus, followed by China (103) and the United Kingdom (78). Among 58 publishers, the top four publishers account for 45% of the publications, with Elsevier leading with 15% of the publications, followed by Springer Nature (12%), MDPI, and Frontiers Media SA with 9% each. Frontiers in Microbiology is the most frequent publication source (33 articles), followed by Scientific Reports (29 articles), PLoS One (17 articles), and Antibiotics (16 articles). The study reveals a substantial increase in research and publications on the use of machine learning to predict antibiotic resistance. Recent research has focused on developing advanced machine learning algorithms that can accurately forecast antibiotic resistance, and a range of algorithms are now being used to address this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.