ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023
Development of a high-throughput minimum inhibitory concentration (HT-MIC) testing workflow.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pathogenome and Plasmid-Borne Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes in a Multidrug-Resistant O111:H8 Shiga Toxin-ProducingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Mixing Is Dispensable for Optical Density-Based High-Throughput Growth Screening Assay in Fission Yeast.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Green synthesis and antibacterial activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles usingRSC advances · 2026Article
- Genotypic and phenotypic strategies to detect antibiotic resistance in foodborne pathogens along the food processing chain.Current research in food science · 2026Review
- Piezoelectric biosensor with dissipation monitoring enables the analysis of bacterial lytic agent activity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A VersaTile Approach to Reprogram the Specificity of the R2-Type Tailocin Towards Different Serotypes ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Determining the minimum inhibitory concentrations of pyrazinamide againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The roots of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination go back to the early 1900s. Since then, the test has undergone modifications and advancements in an effort to increase its dependability and accuracy. Although biological investigations use an ever-increasing number of samples, complicated processes and human error sometimes result in poor data quality, which makes it challenging to replicate scientific conclusions. Automating manual steps using protocols decipherable by machine can ease procedural difficulties. Originally relying on manual pipetting and human vision to determine the results, modern broth dilution MIC testing procedures have incorporated microplate readers to enhance sample analysis. However, current MIC testing procedures are unable to simultaneously evaluate a large number of samples efficiently. Here, we have created a proof-of-concept workflow using the Opentrons OT-2 robot to enable high-throughput MIC testing. We have further optimized the analysis by incorporating Python programming for MIC assignment to streamline the automation. In this workflow, we performed MIC tests on four different strains, three replicates per strain, and analyzed a total of 1,152 wells. Comparing our workflow to a conventional plate MIC procedure, we find that the HT-MIC method is 800% faster while simultaneously boasting a 100% accuracy. Our high-throughput MIC workflow can be adapted in both academic and clinical settings since it is faster, more efficient, and as accurate than many conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.