ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Comparison of microsurgical clipping with intravascular interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and risk factors for intraoperative rupture and bleeding.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for intraoperative rupture risk in microscopic surgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of microsurgical clipping compared with intravascular interventional embolization in the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and the risk factors for intraoperative rupture and bleeding.
methodsThe data of 116 patients with ruptured aneurysms admitted to the People's Hospital of China Three Gorges University from January 2020 to March 2021 were collected for retrospective analysis. Among them, 61 cases with microsurgical clipping were classified as the control group (CG), and the rest 55 with intravascular interventional embolization were the observation group (OG), and the treatment effects in the two groups were compared. The general conditions of operation (operation time, postoperative hospital stay and intraoperative blood loss) were compared between the two groups. The intraoperative rupture of cerebral aneurysm during operation was counted, and the incidence of complications between the groups was compared. Risk factors affecting intraoperative rupture of cerebral aneurysms were analyzed by logistic regression.
resultsThe total clinical treatment efficiency was dramatically higher in the OG than that in the CG (P<0.05). The operative time, postoperative hospital stays, and intraoperative bleeding were all higher in the CG than those in the OG (all P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of wound infection, hydrocephalus, and cerebral infarction between the two groups (all P>0.05). However, the incidence of intraoperative rupture was markedly higher in the CG than that in the OG (P<0.05). Multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, history of hypertension, large diameter of aneurysm, irregular morphology, and anterior communicating artery aneurysm were independent risk factors for intraoperative rupture in patients.
conclusionIntravascular interventional embolization for middle cerebral artery aneurysm rupture is a less invasive procedure with faster recovery time, and history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, history of hypertension, large diameter of aneurysm, irregular morphology, and anterior communicating artery aneurysm are independent risk factors affecting patients with intraoperative rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37303682PMC10251033W4380291753What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.