ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of donafinil and lenvatinib in the treatment of intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Opportunities in the Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Today and Tomorrow.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the therapeutic effects of donafinil and lenvatinib in the treatment of patients with intermediate--advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsA total of 100 patients with intermediate--advanced HCC who received donafinib or lenvatinib treatment in Hechi First People's Hospital, Hechi People's Hospital, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi University of Science and Technology, and other centers from January 2021 to June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into a donafinil group (n=50) and a lenvatinib group (n=50) according to the treatment method. The therapeutic effects and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared, as well as the changes in alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), Golgi glycoprotein 73 (GP-73), and glypican-3 (GPC3) before and after treatment.
resultsThe objective remission rate in the lenvatinib group was less than that in the donafenib group (20% VS 32%,
conclusionBoth donafenib and lenvatinib can effectively treat patients with middle and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, and the local control rate of donafenib is higher than that of lenvatinib. The treatment of intermediate--advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with donafinib has better clinical efficacy than levatinib, which can effectively reduce the severity of patients' disease and prolong their survival time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37303659PMC10250965W4380291890What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.