ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
High-quality nursing service system is superior to routine care in the care management of malignancies.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Interplay of Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Nursing Care in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- Kano Model-Based Analysis of Medical and Nursing Service Needs of Fracture Patients and Their Families.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo analyze the application value of the high-quality nursing service system in the care management of malignancies.
methods116 patients with malignancies treated in the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital between December 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively enrolled. This included 56 patients who received routine care (regular group) and 60 patients treated by high-quality care (high-quality group). Complications, mental state (Self-Rating Depression/Anxiety Scale, SDS/SAS), pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS), cancer-related fatigue (Piper Fatigue Scale, PFS), and quality of life (Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74, GQOL-74) were collected from both groups for comparative analysis. Factors influencing quality of life in patients with malignancies were identified using the multivariate linear regression model.
resultsPatients treated by the high-quality nursing service system experienced fewer complications than those cared by routine care. The high-quality group showed a significantly reduced SDS, SAS, VAS, and PFS score and elevated GQOL-74 scores after nursing compared with the baseline (before nursing) and the regular group. The multivariate linear regression model showed that the type of care had a significant impact on patients' quality of life.
conclusionsThe high-quality nursing service system has a higher application value in the care management of malignancies than routine nursing. This can reduce complications, relieve patients' anxiety, depression, pain degree and cancer-related fatigue, and boost their quality of life, with high clinical popularization prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37303649PMC10251015What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.