ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Integrative bioinformatics and RNA sequencing based methodology results in the exploration of breast invasive carcinoma biomarkers.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- KIF2C/MCAK a prognostic biomarker and its oncogenic potential in malignant progression, and prognosis of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis as biomarker.Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPreviously reported breast invasive carcinoma (BRIC) biomarkers have compromised utility because of their heterogeneity-specific behaviors. The goal of this study was to find BRIC biomarkers that could be used in spite of the heterogeneity barrier.
methodsPreviously reported BRIC-linked hub genes were obtained from the literature via a search technique. A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of the extracted hub genes was constructed, visualized, and analyzed to explore the top six real hub genes. Following this, real hub genes' expression profiling was carried out using various TCGA data sources and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of BT 20 and HMEC cell lines to uncover the tumor-driver roles of the real hub genes.
resultsIn total, 124 BRIC-linked hub genes were collected from the literature via the search technique. From these collected hub genes, a total of 6 genes, including Centrosomal protein of 55 kDa (CEP55), Kinesin Family Member 2C (KIF2C), kinesin family member 20A (KIF20A), Ribonucleotide Reductase Regulatory Subunit M2 (RRM2), Aurora A Kinase (AURKA), and Protein Regulator of cytokinesis 1 (PRC1) were determined to be the real hub genes. Via expression profiling and validation analyses, we documented the overexpression of CEP55, KIF2C, KIF20A, RRM2, AURKA, and PRC1 real hub genes in BRIC patients with different clinical variables. Further correlational analyses showed diverse associations among real hub genes' expression and other important parameters, including promoter methylation status, genetic alteration, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), tumor purity, CD8+ T, CD4+ T immune cell infiltration, and different mutant genes across BRIC samples. Finally, in this work, we investigated several transcription factors (TFS), microRNAs, and therapeutic medicines related to the real hub genes that have great therapeutic potential.
conclusionIn conclusion, we discovered six real hub genes, which may be employed as novel potential biomarkers for BRIC patients with different clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37303632PMC10251034W4380290635What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.