ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2023
Study on the effectiveness, safety and comprehensive evaluations of novel medical restraint gloves in patients with consciousness disorders.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop novel medical restraint gloves and investigate their application effect in patients with consciousness and cognitive disorders.
methodsThe clinical data of 63 patients with consciousness or cognitive impairment admitted to The First People's Hospital of Lin'an District from June 2021 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different type of restraint gloves used for treatment, patients were divided into a control group and an observation group. Thirty-one patients from the observation group were treated with the novel medical restraint gloves, and 32 patients in the control group underwent conventional restraint gloves. The effectiveness, safety as well as the comprehensive evaluations of the gloves were detected and compared between the two groups.
resultsIn the term of effectiveness of gloves, the outcomes of protective performances, treatment operations, the fixed gloves/rings, the flexible fingers and overturned gloves in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (all P<0.05). In the term of safety of gloves, there was significant difference regarding the local skin redness (P<0.05) between the control group and the observation group, while there was no remarkable difference regarding strangulation marks, local skin damage and local skin swelling. The results of comprehensive evaluation showed the qualified outcome in the observation group was 100%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (50%) (P<0.05).
conclusionCompared with the traditional restraint gloves, the outcomes of effectiveness, safety and comprehensive evaluation results from the observation group were better, indicating that the novel medical restraint gloves better meet the requirements of clinical practices and thus have more clinical application value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37303630PMC10251008What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.