ArticleCureus2023
A Comparative Study of Intralesional Acyclovir vs Immunotherapy for Treatment of Viral Warts.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Oral isotretinoin for the treatment of dermatologic conditions other than acne: a case series.Dermatology reports · 2026Article
- Intralesional Immunotherapy for Non-Genital Viral Warts: A Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Efficacy of intralesional acyclovir versus quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine for treatment of recalcitrant cutaneous warts: a clinical trial.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Remission of HPV-Related Diseases by Antivirals for Herpesvirus: Clinical Cases and a Literature Review.Viruses · 2024Review
- Clinical and Dermoscopic Study of Intra-lesional Injection of Acyclovir Versus Candida Antigen in Treatment of Plantar Warts.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViral warts are caused by human papillomavirus (HPV), are difficult to treat with conventional modalities, and are cosmetically disfiguring; hence, immunomodulators are being used. The viral origin of warts suggests the antiviral drug acyclovir as a potential therapeutic option. The current study compares the effect of intralesional acyclovir (nucleoside analogue) and intralesional purified protein derivative (PPD) (immunotherapy) in treating various viral warts. METHODOLOGY: Prospective observational comparative study was conducted to determine the efficacy of acyclovir, and PPD administered via the intralesional route in patients with viral warts. The study population was categorized into two groups. One group received intralesional acyclovir, and the other received intralesional PPD. Patients were followed-up with for three months. Outcomes considered in our study were recovery (complete, partial, and no recovery) and side effects like pain, burning sensation, and desquamation. Statistical analysis was carried out by coguide software.
resultsIn our study total of 40 participants, 20 in each group were included. 25 and 15 were of age <30, and ≥ 30, respectively, while 20 were males, and 20 females. Our study reported 60%, and 30% of complete recovery with intralesional acyclovir treatment and intralesional PPD treatment, respectively, in the twelfth week. However, p-value > 0.05 represented no significance between groups. 90% in the acyclovir-treated group presented with pain, and 100% presented with burning sensation, while in the case of PPD-treated group, 60% presented no side effects and the rest 40% showed pain.
conclusionsIntralesional acyclovir is more effective in treating viral warts than PPD. The focus is to be laid on anticipated side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.