Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303396›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Dengue in Early Pregnancy: A Neglected Problem?

Ruchita Sinha, Mamta R Datta

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Burden of Dengue in Pregnant Individuals: A Systematic Literature Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment protocol of dengue during pregnancy and the postpartum period.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ruchita SinhaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Tata Manipal Medical College, Jamshedpur, IND.
Mamta R DattaObstetrics and Gynaecology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, IND.
Tata Main Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Dengue is caused by a virus from the Flaviviridae family. Although the literature on this disease is sparse, some studies have shown the effects of dengue in the first trimester of pregnancy. However, the sample size in these studies is limited. Aims and objective The current study aimed to compare foetomaternal outcomes in pregnant patients with dengue in early (< 24 weeks) and late (> 24 weeks) pregnancy and find the prevalence and predictive factors for abortion in pregnant patients with dengue. Material and methods This retrospective study included all pregnant patients (

Indexed as

abortiondenguefetomaternal effectspredictive factorspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37303396
PMCPMC10247336
OpenAlexW4380291187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.