Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303395›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Influence of Computerized Tomography Imaging on Treatment of Periprosthetic Proximal Femur Fractures.

Canon C Cornelius, Stephen Warner, Joel Thomas, David Rodriguez-Quintana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Canon C CorneliusOrthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Stephen WarnerOrthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
Joel ThomasOrthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.
David Rodriguez-QuintanaOrthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFF) are increasing in incidence and management of such injuries requires a specialized skill set combined with detailed knowledge of component design. To assist with planning, computed tomography (CT) can be used pre-operatively to give a surgeon more information. No study to date has shown the utility of obtaining preoperative CT. The goal of this study is to show that CT is a useful diagnostic adjunct and report any differences in how subspecialties such as orthopedic traumatologists and arthroplasty surgeons use it. Methods Seventeen PPFF cases met our inclusion criteria. They were shown to six faculty, three trauma and three arthroplasty surgeons. They viewed the plain radiographs and then CTs. After each they filled out the same questionnaire that included their assessment of diagnosis and proposed treatment plan both before and after access to CT imaging. Fleiss and Cohen kappa were used to compare inter- and intra-observer reliability. Results The interobserver kappa values (

Indexed as

arthroplastyorthopaedic adult reconstructionorthopaedic traumatologyproximal femur fracturerevision arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID37303395
PMCPMC10250062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.