ArticleCureus2023
The Implementation of a Rib Fracture Pathway at a Small District General Hospital to Improve Patient Care.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Rib fractures are common presentations to the emergency department following blunt thoracic trauma. Despite this injury causing significant morbidity and mortality, no national guidelines exist to guide the acute management of this condition. In light of this, this quality improvement project was conducted at a district general hospital (DGH) with the aim of assessing the impact of using a simple rib fracture management pathway. Methods A retrospective review of paper notes and electronic databases of patients with a recorded diagnosis of "rib fractures" were reviewed. Following this, a management pathway was designed and then implemented, which incorporated BMJ Best Practices and local hospital needs. The study then assessed the impact of the pathway. Results Prior to implementing the pathway, a total of 47 individual patients were included in the statistical analysis. Of the patients analysed, 44% were older than 65 years. Of note, 89% received regular paracetamol for analgesia, 41% received regular nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and 69% received regular opioids. Advanced analgesics such as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and nerve blocks were poorly used; for instance, a PCA was used in only 13% of cases. Only 6% of patients received daily pain team reviews and only 44% of patients were seen by physiotherapists within the first 24 hours. Additionally, 93% of patients who were admitted under general surgery had a STUMBL (STUdy of the Management of BLunt chest wall trauma) prognostic score >10. Post-pathway implementation, a total of 22 individual patients were included in the statistical analysis. Of them, 52% were older than 65 years. The use of simple analgesia was unchanged. However advanced analgesia was better escalated, and PCAs were used 43% of the time. The involvement of other healthcare professionals improved; 59% were reviewed by the pain team in the first 24 hours, 45% received daily pain team reviews, and 54% received advanced analgesia. Conclusion Based on our findings, implementing a simple rib fracture pathway is effective at improving the management of rib fracture patients admitted to our DGH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.