ReviewCureus2023
Laparoscopy in Pregnancy: A Comparative Review of National Guidelines.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Cholecystitis in Pregnancy: A Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, Diagnostic Challenges, Management, and Maternal-Fetal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Laparoscopy is preferred for small bowel obstruction in pregnancy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 10-year, single center study of 32 cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in pregnant patients: A single-center retrospective cohort study.Turkish journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Management and treatment of breast cancer in pregnant women.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- The impact of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on pregnancy outcomes in the United States.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- A rare case report of first-trimester intestinal obstruction masquerading as ectopic pregnancy: Insights from a low-resource setting.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in pregnancy: a case series.Journal of minimally invasive surgery · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia in the First Trimester of Pregnancy-Case Report and Literature Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Acute abdomen in third trimester of pregnancy-a rare case of perforated Meckel's diverticulitis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gynecological and general surgical conditions requiring surgical management during pregnancy constitute a medical challenge, which often entails the collaboration of numerous medical specialties. In recent years, laparoscopy in pregnancy has been accepted as a safe alternative to open surgery. This has led gynecological societies to conduct studies and issue guidelines related to laparoscopy in pregnancy, with a view to assisting and guiding clinicians and surgeons. The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from various published national guidelines on laparoscopy in pregnant women. To that end, a descriptive review of guidelines from the British Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (BSGE), the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOCG), and the Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français (CNGOF) was conducted. Regarding diagnosis, the SAGES and SOCG societies recommend ultrasound as the preferred and safe imaging technique during pregnancy. In terms of the optimal timing for laparoscopic intervention, BSGE and SAGES do not restrict the laparoscopic approach based on safety, depending on the gestation week, whereas SOCG and CNGOF propose early second trimester and first and second quarter of pregnancy respectively. There is an overall consensus regarding patient positioning, initial port placement, insufflation pressure during the operation, venous thromboembolic (VTE) prophylaxis, fetal heart monitoring, and tocolysis among the reviewed guidelines. Moreover, only the BSGE mentions the need for corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and anti-D prophylactic administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.