ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2023
Toward Integration of Pharmacogenomic Tests into Daily Clinical Practice: A General Survey for Polish Healthcare Workers.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomics (PGx) has a direct influence on personalized drug therapy for various types of disorders and has been proven to have an important role in the future of medicine. The present study evaluated the awareness of PGx testing of clinicians and healthcare workers in the Republic of Poland. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first direct assessment of Polish healthcare professionals' attitudes toward introducing PGx tests into daily clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS We used a comprehensive anonymous questionnaire with queries on level of education, background knowledge of PGx tests, advantages and barriers for implementation of such tests, and clinicians' desire to order the test that was distributed online to doctors, healthcare workers, related students/Ph.D. students, and administrative staff managing healthcare units. RESULTS We gathered 315 responses. According to the answers, two-thirds of participants had heard about PGx before (64.4%). An overwhelming majority of respondents appreciated the benefits of PGx (93.3%). Indeed, prior knowledge and level of education showed significant associations with positive attitudes toward PGx clinical testing (P≤0.05). However, all participants agreed there are major challenges for including such tests as part of routine clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS While the awareness and interest in PGx clinical testing in Polish healthcare providers are rising, some main barriers for implementation of these tests still need to be addressed in Poland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.