Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303037›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2023

Influence of gender on age-associated in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.

Ryoung-Eun Ko, Danbee Kang, Juhee Cho, Soo Jin Na, Chi Ryang Chung, Sung Yoon Lim, Yeon Joo Lee, Sunghoon Park, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carrageenan-induced immunothrombotic models in rodents (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Sex matters: Is it time for a SOFA makeover?Critical care (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ryoung-Eun Ko *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Danbee Kang *Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Juhee ChoCenter for Clinical Epidemiology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Jin NaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chi Ryang ChungDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yoon LimDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Joo LeeDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Sunghoon ParkDepartment of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Dong Kyu OhDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su Yeon LeeDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mi Hyeon ParkDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Haein LeeDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chae-Man LimDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gee Young SuhDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. smccritcare@gmail.com.
Korean Sepsis Alliance (KSA) investigators

Funding

Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency 2019E280500, 2020E280700, and 2021-10-026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous epidemiological studies investigating gender-dependent clinical outcomes in sepsis have shown conflicting evidence. This study aimed to investigate the effect of gender on in-hospital mortality due to sepsis according to age group.

methodsThis study used data from the Korean Sepsis Alliance, an ongoing nationwide prospective multicenter cohort from 19 participating hospitals in South Korea. All adult patients diagnosed with sepsis in the emergency departments of the participating hospitals between September 2019 and December 2021 were included in the analysis. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between male and female. Eligible patients were stratified by age into 19-50 years, 50-80 years, and ≥ 80 years old individuals.

resultsDuring the study period, 6442 patients were included in the analysis, and 3650 (56.7%) were male. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] for in-hospital mortality for male compared with female was 1.15 (95% CI = 1.02-1.29). Interestingly, in the age 19-50 group, the risk of in-hospital mortality for males was significantly lower than that of females [0.57 (95% CI = 0.35-0.93)]. For female, the risk of death remained relatively stable until around age 80 (P for linearity = 0.77), while in males, there was a linear increase in the risk of in-hospital death until around age 80 (P for linearity < 0.01). Respiratory infection (53.8% vs. 37.4%, p < 0.01) was more common in male, whereas urinary tract infection (14.7% vs. 29.8%, p < 0.01) was more common in female. For respiratory infection, male had significantly lower in-hospital mortality than female in the age 19-50 groups (adjusted OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.12-0.69).

conclusionsGender may influence age-associated sepsis outcomes. Further studies are needed to replicate our findings and fully understand the interaction of gender and age on the outcomes of patients with sepsis.

Indexed as

Respiratory Tract InfectionsSepsisShock, SepticAdultAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesYoung AdultAgeGenderSepsisSeptic shockSex

Identifiers

PMID37303037
PMCPMC10257805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.