Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37303034›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2023

The Registry for Migraine (REFORM) study: methodology, demographics, and baseline clinical characteristics.

William Kristian Karlsson, Håkan Ashina, Christopher Kjær Cullum, Rune Häckert Christensen, Haidar Muhsen Al-Khazali, Faisal Mohammad Amin, Messoud Ashina, REFORM Investigators

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04592952 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Hypersensitivity to CGRP as a Predictive Biomarker of Migraine Prevention With Erenumab

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Headache CenterRan2020 to 2025Enrolled400ConditionsMigraineArmsCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide, Erenumab
NCT04603976 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Registry for Migraine - Clinical Core

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Headache CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,000ConditionsMigraineArmsErenumab
NCT04674020 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

Registry for Migraine - Structural and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before and After Erenumab Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorDanish Headache CenterRan2020 to 2025Enrolled250ConditionsMigraine, HeadacheArmsErenumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Migraine in the Corporate Sector: Prevalence, Risk Factors, Job Efficiency Impact, and Management Strategies.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association between serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels and migraine: a REFORM study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Postdromal symptoms in migraine: a REFORM study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Article
  20. Clinical features of migraine with aura: a REFORM study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

William Kristian KarlssonDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Håkan AshinaDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christopher Kjær CullumDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rune Häckert ChristensenDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Haidar Muhsen Al-KhazaliDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faisal Mohammad AminDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Messoud AshinaDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Valdemar Hansens Vej 5, Glostrup, 2600, Copenhagen, Denmark. ashina@dadlnet.dk.
REFORM Investigators
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Lundbeck Foundation Professor grant R310-2018-3711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundErenumab has demonstrated effectiveness for prevention of migraine attacks, but the treatment is costly, and a considerable proportion of patients do not respond to it. The Registry for Migraine study (REFORM) was initiated to discover biomarkers that can predict response to erenumab in patients with migraine. The specific objective was to investigate differences in erenumab efficacy based on clinical information, blood-based biomarkers, structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and response to intravenous infusion of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). In this first report of the REFORM study, we provide a comprehensive description of the study methodology, and present the baseline characteristics of the study population.

methodsThe REFORM study was a single-center, prospective, longitudinal cohort study in adults with migraine who were scheduled to receive preventive treatment with erenumab as part of a separate, open-label, single-arm phase IV trial. The study included four periods: a 2-week screening period (Weeks -6 to -5), 4-week baseline period (Week -4 to Day 1), 24-week treatment period (Day 1 to Week 24), and a 24-week follow-up period without treatment (Week 25 to Week 48). Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded using a semi-structured interview, whilst outcome data were obtained using a headache diary, patient-reported outcomes, blood sampling, brain MRI, and responsiveness to intravenous infusion of CGRP.

resultsThe study enrolled 751 participants, with a mean age ± SD of 43.8 ± 12.2 years, of which 88.8% (n = 667) were female. At enrollment, 64.7% (n = 486) were diagnosed with chronic migraine, and 30.2% (n = 227) had history of aura. The mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) was 14.5 ± 7.0. Concomitant preventive medications were used by 48.5% (n = 364) of the participants, and 39.9% (n = 300) had failed ≥ 4 preventive medications.

conclusionThe REFORM study enrolled a population with a high migraine burden and frequent use of concomitant medications. The baseline characteristics were representative of patients with migraine in specialized headache clinics. Future publications will report the results of the investigations presented in this article.

trial registrationThe study and sub-studies were registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04592952; NCT04603976; and NCT04674020).

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related PeptideMigraine DisordersAdultDemographyFemaleHeadacheHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesRegistriesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideBiochemistryBiomarkerCGRPErenumabMagnetic resonance imagingPredictorsProvocation

Identifiers

PMID37303034
PMCPMC10257973
OpenAlexW4380272446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.