Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37302532›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2023

A Worksheet to Facilitate Discussions of Values for Patients With Metastatic Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Noah J Mathis, Hadley Maya, Amanda Santoro, Meredith Bartelstein, Max Vaynrub, Jonathan T Yang, Erin F Gillespie, Anjali V Desai, Divya Yerramilli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Noah J MathisDepartment of Radiation Oncology (N.J.M., A.S., D.Y.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Hadley MayaDepartment of Surgery (H.M., M.B., M.V.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Amanda SantoroDepartment of Radiation Oncology (N.J.M., A.S., D.Y.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Meredith BartelsteinDepartment of Surgery (H.M., M.B., M.V.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Max VaynrubDepartment of Surgery (H.M., M.B., M.V.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jonathan T YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology (J.T.Y., E.F.G.), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Erin F GillespieDepartment of Radiation Oncology (J.T.Y., E.F.G.), University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Anjali V DesaiDepartment of Medicine (A.V.D.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Divya YerramilliDepartment of Radiation Oncology (N.J.M., A.S., D.Y.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: yerramid@mskcc.org.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Leveraging implementation science to accelerate adoption of shorter-course radiation for breast and prostate cancerK08CA252640 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GILLESPIE, ERIN FAYE · 2020 to 2025
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA252640NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIndividual goals and values should drive medical decision making for patients with serious illness. Unfortunately, clinicians' existing strategies to encourage reflection and communication regarding patients' personal values are generally time-consuming and limited in scope.

objectivesHerein, we develop a novel intervention to facilitate at-home reflection and discussion about goals and values. We then conduct a pilot study of our intervention in a small population of patients with metastatic cancer.

methodsWe first engaged former cancer patients and their families to adapt an existing serious illness communication guide to a worksheet format. We then distributed this adapted "Values Worksheet" to 28 patients with metastatic cancer. We surveyed participants about their perceptions of the Worksheet to assess its feasibility.

resultsOf 30 patients approached, 28 agreed to participate. Seventeen participants completed the Values Worksheet, and of those 11 (65%) responded to the follow-up survey. Seven of eleven reported that the Values Worksheet was a good use of time, and nine of eleven would be likely to recommend it to other patients with cancer. Eight of ten reported mild distress, two of ten reported moderate to severe distress.

conclusionThe Values Worksheet was a feasible way to facilitate at-home discussions of goals and values for select patients with metastatic cancer. Further research should focus on identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from the Values Worksheet, and should employ the Worksheet as one tool to facilitate reflection on the questions that arise around serious illness, as an adjunct to serious illness conversations with a physician.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPhysiciansClinical Decision-MakingCommunicationHumansPilot Projectsgoals of carePatient valuesserious illness conversations

Identifiers

PMID37302532
PMCPMC11154586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.