ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Evaluation of the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining cytology for cervical lesion detection in premenopausal and postmenopausal Chinese women.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- P16/Ki67 dual staining versus cytology for identifying high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+/CIN3+) in triage management of HR-HPV-positive women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Pooled it
- HPV genotype-specific p16/Ki67 expression with machine learning-assisted assessment in cervical neoplasia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies on the clinical performance of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining in detecting cervical lesions by menopausal status were limited.
methods4364 eligible women were enrolled with valid p16/Ki-67, HR-HPV, and LBC test results, including 542 cancer and 217 CIN2/3 cases. The positivity rates of p16 and Ki-67 single staining and p16/ Ki-67 dual-staining were analyzed by different pathological grades and age groups. The sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each test in different subgroups were calculated and compared.
resultsP16/Ki-67 dual-staining positivity increased with histopathological severity in premenopausal and postmenopausal women (P < 0.05), while no increasing trends of individual expression of p16 single staining and Ki-67 single staining were observed in postmenopausal women. P16/Ki-67 showed higher SPE (88.09% vs. 81.91%, P < 0.001) and PPV (33.8% vs. 13.18%, P < 0.001) in detecting CIN2/3, and higher SEN (89.97% vs. 82.61%, P = 0.012) and SPE (83.22% vs. 79.89%, P = 0.011) in detecting cancer in premenopausal women than postmenopausal women. For triaging the HR-HPV+ population to identify CIN2/3, p16/Ki-67 performed comparably to LBC in the premenopausal women, and showed higher PPV (51.14% vs. 23.08%, P < 0.001) in premenopausal than postmenopausal women. For triaging ASC-US/LSIL population, p16/Ki-67 demonstrated higher SPE and lower colposcopy referral rate than HR-HPV in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
conclusionsExpressions of p16/Ki-67 dual-staining between premenopausal and postmenopausal women are varied. P16/Ki-67 performs better in detecting cervical lesions in premenopausal women. For triaging, p16/Ki-67 is suitable for HR-HPV+ women, especially premenopausal women, to identify CIN2/3 and women with ASC-US/LSIL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.