ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023
Implementation of Nanopore sequencing as a pragmatic workflow for copy number variant confirmation in the clinic.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unified long-read panel for Parkinson's and repeat expansion disorders.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Flexible and rapid validation of structural variation using adaptive sampling.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- NanoVar: a comprehensive workflow for structural variant detection to uncover the genome's hidden patterns.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- The transformative impact of ultra-rapid nanopore sequencing in precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Long-read sequencing and next-generation CRISPR editors: a unified pipeline for rare disease precision medicine with ethical and regulatory perspectives.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Methodological Comparison of Short-Read and Long-Read Sequencing Methods on Colorectal Cancer Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Epidemiological report and diagnostic approach used in the neuromuscular population of Liege, Belgium.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Long read whole genome sequencing-based discovery of structural variants and their role in aetiology of non-syndromic autism spectrum disorder in India.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Applying the National Genomic DNA Reference Materials to Evaluate the Performance of Nanopore Sequencing in Identifying Thalassemia Variants.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Haplotypic resolution of the challenging genomic regions of MHC and KIR using a combination of targeted sequencing and a novel assembly pipeline.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Review
- Concordance of Whole-Genome Long-Read Sequencing with Standard Clinical Testing for Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndromes.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2025Article
- Nanopore adaptive sampling to identify the NLR gene family in melon (Cucumis melo L.).BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The Cancer Genome in the Long Reads Era.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Benchmarking nanopore sequencing and rapid genomics feasibility: validation at a quaternary hospital in New Zealand.NPJ genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Editorial: Novel applications of ONT technologies in genomics and transcriptomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis of rare genetic diseases can be a long, expensive and complex process, involving an array of tests in the hope of obtaining an actionable result. Long-read sequencing platforms offer the opportunity to make definitive molecular diagnoses using a single assay capable of detecting variants, characterizing methylation patterns, resolving complex rearrangements, and assigning findings to long-range haplotypes. Here, we demonstrate the clinical utility of Nanopore long-read sequencing by validating a confirmatory test for copy number variants (CNVs) in neurodevelopmental disorders and illustrate the broader applications of this platform to assess genomic features with significant clinical implications.
methodsWe used adaptive sampling on the Oxford Nanopore platform to sequence 25 genomic DNA samples and 5 blood samples collected from patients with known or false-positive copy number changes originally detected using short-read sequencing. Across the 30 samples (a total of 50 with replicates), we assayed 35 known unique CNVs (a total of 55 with replicates) and one false-positive CNV, ranging in size from 40 kb to 155 Mb, and assessed the presence or absence of suspected CNVs using normalized read depth.
resultsAcross 50 samples (including replicates) sequenced on individual MinION flow cells, we achieved an average on-target mean depth of 9.5X and an average on-target read length of 4805 bp. Using a custom read depth-based analysis, we successfully confirmed the presence of all 55 known CNVs (including replicates) and the absence of one false-positive CNV. Using the same CNV-targeted data, we compared genotypes of single nucleotide variant loci to verify that no sample mix-ups occurred between assays. For one case, we also used methylation detection and phasing to investigate the parental origin of a 15q11.2-q13 duplication with implications for clinical prognosis.
conclusionsWe present an assay that efficiently targets genomic regions to confirm clinically relevant CNVs with a concordance rate of 100%. Furthermore, we demonstrate how integration of genotype, methylation, and phasing data from the Nanopore sequencing platform can potentially simplify and shorten the diagnostic odyssey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.