Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301971›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Implementation of Nanopore sequencing as a pragmatic workflow for copy number variant confirmation in the clinic.

Stephanie U Greer, Jacquelin Botello, Donna Hongo, Brynn Levy, Premal Shah, Matthew Rabinowitz, Danny E Miller, Kate Im, Akash Kumar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Cancer Genome in the Long Reads Era.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. International journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie U GreerMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Jacquelin BotelloMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Donna HongoMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Brynn LevyMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Premal ShahMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Matthew RabinowitzMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Danny E MillerDepartment of Pediatrics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, WA, Seattle, USA.
Kate ImMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Akash KumarMyOme Inc., 535 Middlefield Rd Suite 170, Menlo Park, CA, USA. akumar@myome.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9442-3597
Menlo School · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of rare genetic diseases can be a long, expensive and complex process, involving an array of tests in the hope of obtaining an actionable result. Long-read sequencing platforms offer the opportunity to make definitive molecular diagnoses using a single assay capable of detecting variants, characterizing methylation patterns, resolving complex rearrangements, and assigning findings to long-range haplotypes. Here, we demonstrate the clinical utility of Nanopore long-read sequencing by validating a confirmatory test for copy number variants (CNVs) in neurodevelopmental disorders and illustrate the broader applications of this platform to assess genomic features with significant clinical implications.

methodsWe used adaptive sampling on the Oxford Nanopore platform to sequence 25 genomic DNA samples and 5 blood samples collected from patients with known or false-positive copy number changes originally detected using short-read sequencing. Across the 30 samples (a total of 50 with replicates), we assayed 35 known unique CNVs (a total of 55 with replicates) and one false-positive CNV, ranging in size from 40 kb to 155 Mb, and assessed the presence or absence of suspected CNVs using normalized read depth.

resultsAcross 50 samples (including replicates) sequenced on individual MinION flow cells, we achieved an average on-target mean depth of 9.5X and an average on-target read length of 4805 bp. Using a custom read depth-based analysis, we successfully confirmed the presence of all 55 known CNVs (including replicates) and the absence of one false-positive CNV. Using the same CNV-targeted data, we compared genotypes of single nucleotide variant loci to verify that no sample mix-ups occurred between assays. For one case, we also used methylation detection and phasing to investigate the parental origin of a 15q11.2-q13 duplication with implications for clinical prognosis.

conclusionsWe present an assay that efficiently targets genomic regions to confirm clinically relevant CNVs with a concordance rate of 100%. Furthermore, we demonstrate how integration of genotype, methylation, and phasing data from the Nanopore sequencing platform can potentially simplify and shorten the diagnostic odyssey.

Indexed as

Nanopore SequencingDNA Copy Number VariationsGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNAWorkflowAdaptive samplingClinical testingCopy number variantsGenome analysisLong-read sequencingNeurodevelopmental disordersOxford Nanopore TechnologiesTargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID37301971
PMCPMC10257846
OpenAlexW4380150071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.