Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301937›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

The economic burden of inherited retinal disease in Singapore: a prevalence-based cost-of-illness study.

Junxing Chay, Rachael Wei Chao Tang, Tien-En Tan, Choi Mun Chan, Ranjana Mathur, Brian J H Lee, Hiok Hong Chan, Shaun S K P Sim, Saadia Farooqui, Kelvin Y C Teo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Junxing ChayHealth Services & Systems Research Program, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3291-4523
Rachael Wei Chao TangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Tien-En TanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Choi Mun ChanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Ranjana MathurSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Brian J H LeeDepartment of Medical Retina, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Hiok Hong ChanSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Shaun S K P SimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8940-4842
Saadia FarooquiSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Kelvin Y C TeoSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7458-7081
Eva K FenwickSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Ecosse L LamoureuxSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Chui Ming Gemmy CheungSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Beau J FennerSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore. gmsbjf@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

SingHealth Foundation SHF-SNEC 0920-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the economic impact of inherited retinal disease (IRD) among Singaporeans.

methodsIRD prevalence was calculated using population-based data. Focused surveys were conducted for sequentially enrolled IRD patients from a tertiary hospital. The IRD cohort was compared to the age- and gender-matched general population. Economic costs were expanded to the national IRD population to estimate productivity and healthcare costs.

resultsNational IRD caseload was 5202 cases (95% CI, 1734-11273). IRD patients (n = 95) had similar employment rates to the general population (67.4% vs. 70.7%; p = 0.479). Annual income was lower among IRD patients than the general population (SGD 19,500 vs. 27,161; p < 0.0001). Employed IRD patients had lower median income than the general population (SGD 39,000 vs. 52,650; p < 0.0001). Per capita cost of IRD was SGD 9382, with a national burden of SGD 48.8 million per year. Male gender (beta of SGD 6543, p = 0.003) and earlier onset (beta of SGD 150/year, p = 0.009) predicted productivity loss. Treatment of the most economically impacted 10% of IRD patients with an effective IRD therapy required initial treatment cost of less than SGD 250,000 (USD 188,000) for cost savings to be achieved within 20 years.

conclusionsEmployment rates among Singaporean IRD patients were the same as the general population, but patient income was significantly lower. Economic losses were driven in part by male patients with early age of onset. Direct healthcare costs contributed relatively little to the financial burden.

Indexed as

Financial StressRetinal DiseasesCost of IllnessHealth Care CostsHumansMalePrevalenceSingapore

Identifiers

PMID37301937
PMCPMC10698171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.