Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37301921›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparison of pathogen detection consistency between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and blood culture in patients with suspected bloodstream infection.

Yuhua Zhou, Wen Shi, Yi Wen, Enqiang Mao, Tongtian Ni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuhua Zhou *Department of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijiner Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Wen Shi *Department of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijiner Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Yi WenDepartment of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijiner Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Enqiang MaoDepartment of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijiner Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China. maoeq@yeah.net.
Tongtian NiDepartment of Emergency, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197, Ruijiner Road, Huangpu District, Shanghai, 200025, China. topntt@126.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has gradually been carried out by clinical practitioner. However, few studies have compared it with blood cultures in patients suffering from suspected bloodstream infections. The purpose of this study was to compare the detection of pathogenic microorganisms by these two assays in patients with suspected bloodstream infection. We retrospectively studied patients with fever, chills, antibiotic use for more than 3 days, suspected bloodstream infection, and admission to the emergency department of Ruijin Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022. All patients had blood drawn on the same day for blood mNGS and blood cultures. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected on the day blood was drawn. The detection of pathogenic microorganisms by the two methods was compared. Risk factors and in-hospital mortality in patients with bloodstream infections were analysed separately for these two assays. In all 99 patients, the pathogenic microorganisms detection rate in blood mNGS was significantly higher than that in blood culture. Blood mNGS was consistent with blood culture in only 12.00% of all positive bacterial and fungal test results. The level of CRP is related to bacteraemia, fungaemia and viraemia detected by blood mNGS. No clear risk factors could be found in patients with a positive blood culture. In critically ill patients, both tests failed to improve patient outcomes. In patients with suspected bloodstream infection, mNGS is not yet a complete replacement for blood cultures.

Indexed as

Blood CultureSepsisHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMetagenomicsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityViremia

Identifiers

PMID37301921
PMCPMC10257643
OpenAlexW4380203607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.