ArticleNPJ precision oncology2023
Bayesian risk prediction model for colorectal cancer mortality through integration of clinicopathologic and genomic data.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating statistical models for overdispersed multiomics data: a multiplex immunofluorescence case study.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Foundation Model-Enabled Multimodal Deep Learning for Prognostic Prediction in Colorectal Cancer with Incomplete Modalities: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Study.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Density of T-cell Subsets in Colorectal Cancer in Relation to Disease-Specific Survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of Bayesian network applications in gastrointestinal cancers.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Tumor-immune partitioning and clustering algorithm for identifying tumor-immune cell spatial interaction signatures within the tumor microenvironment.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Treatment.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Review
- Evolution of Colorectal Cancer Trends and Treatment Outcomes: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis (2019-2023) in West Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Association between somatic microsatellite instability, hypermutation status, and specific T cell subsets in colorectal cancer tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Classification and Diagnostic Prediction of Colorectal Cancer Mortality Based on Machine Learning Algorithms: A Multicenter National Study.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Non-Contrasted CT Radiomics for SAH Prognosis Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Routine tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging of colorectal cancer is imperfect in predicting survival due to tumor pathobiological heterogeneity and imprecise assessment of tumor spread. We leveraged Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), a statistical learning technique, to comprehensively analyze patient-specific tumor characteristics for the improvement of prognostic prediction. Of 75 clinicopathologic, immune, microbial, and genomic variables in 815 stage II-III patients within two U.S.-wide prospective cohort studies, the BART risk model identified seven stable survival predictors. Risk stratifications (low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk) based on model-predicted survival were statistically significant (hazard ratios 0.19-0.45, vs. higher risk; P < 0.0001) and could be externally validated using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data (P = 0.0004). BART demonstrated model flexibility, interpretability, and comparable or superior performance to other machine-learning models. Integrated bioinformatic analyses using BART with tumor-specific factors can robustly stratify colorectal cancer patients into prognostic groups and be readily applied to clinical oncology practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.