ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2023
The one-step fabrication of porous hASC-laden GelMa constructs using a handheld printing system.
Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gelatin-based porous scaffolds: design concepts, production, and applications in precision regenerative medicine.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Gelatin Methacryloyl/Sodium Alginate/Cellulose Nanocrystal Inks and 3D Printing for Dental Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2024Article
- Biofabrication methods for reconstructing extracellular matrix mimetics.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Current Biomedical Applications of 3D-Printed Hydrogels.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fabrication of highly porous cell-loaded structures in tissue engineering applications has been a challenging issue because non-porous cell-laden struts can cause severe cell necrosis in the middle region owing to poor transport of nutrients and oxygen. In this study, we propose a versatile handheld 3D printer for the effective fabrication of porous cell-laden methacrylated gelatin (GelMa) with high porosity (≈97%) by air injection and a bubble-making system using mesh filters through which a mixture of air/GelMa bioink is passed. In particular, the pore size and foamability of the cell constructs could be manipulated using various processing parameters (rheological properties of GelMa, filter size and number, and air-bioink volume ratio). To demonstrate the feasibility of the cell construct as a tissue engineering substitute for muscle regeneration, in vitro cellular activities and in vivo regeneration ability of human adipose stem cells were assessed. The in vitro results demonstrated that the human adipose stem cells (hASCs) fabricated using the handheld 3D printer were alive and well-proliferated. Furthermore, the in vivo results showed that the hASCs-constructs directly printed from the handheld 3D printer showed significant restoration of functionality and efficient muscle regeneration in the volumetric muscle loss model of mice. Based on these results, the fabrication method of the porous cell-laden construct could be a promising tool for regenerating muscle tissues.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.